Scottish Independence Referendum 18th September.

[codash1099]

Forgive my ignorance, I thought Cameron was a Tory? It says he's a member of the Conservative party on the internet, which has also been run by Thatcher, who was a Tory. So I'm confused?

One and the same thing.

 

[samh004]

One and the same thing.

So he's not liked by his own party and they'll use this to oust him. No real story?

 

[codash1099]

So he's not liked by his own party and they'll use this to oust him. No real story?

Not exactly an unheard of situation in politics.!

 

[drron]

That story above about Tory MPs wanting Cameron to resign if Scotland secedes made me think it could be a masterstroke by the Conservatives to bolster their power. Scotland wouldn't have too many Tory seats (I can't imagine there are any) so losing all those Labor (and other) seats to another country would make it simpler for the Conservatives to gain a majority in the rest of the country. Or have I got it wrong?

Of the 59 Scottish seats in the Commons Labour holds 41,SNP 17 and the Conservatives 1.
However the date for Scottish independence according to the referendum is about 9 months after the next General election.Several hypothetical scenarios of Labor winning a majority but 9 months later losing it to the Conservatives.

 

[RailFlyer]

I was working with a Scot in NZ last week. I told him that David Cameron had emailed me and said if there was a Yes vote that I was to take the passports from any Scots I knew and burn them. I was then to instruct them to report to the nearest Scottish embassy for a replacement. He looked worried.

 

[dk4]

I am going to be outrageously politically incorrect, and say that I now think that this whole Scottish independence thing presents a great opportunity for comprehensive parliamentary review in the UK.

IMO there is no place for unelected Peers in a parliament of the 21st century, and the House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with a federalised "Senate" where representation is elected, but the allocation of seats within it skewed to the smaller populous entities in the UK: i.e. Scotland & Wales, then Northern Ireland, the Islands and any far flung dependencies' still part of the union. With the Commons remaining the seat of government, and proportionally representative of the population of the UK as a whole. (So while the very English feel in the House of Commons would remain, a new house of oversight would ensure more balance for the views of the other nations which make up the UK.)

What a squandered opportunity by the current Queen to make hers a truly democratic mark on the nation!

 

[Cool Cat Phil]

I am going to be outrageously politically incorrect, and say that I now think that this whole Scottish independence thing presents a great opportunity for comprehensive parliamentary review in the UK.

IMO there is no place for unelected Peers in a parliament of the 21st century, and the House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with a federalised "Senate" where representation is elected, but the allocation of seats within it skewed to the smaller populous entities in the UK: i.e. Scotland & Wales, then Northern Ireland, the Islands and any far flung dependencies' still part of the union. With the Commons remaining the seat of government, and proportionally representative of the population of the UK as a whole. (So while the very English feel in the House of Commons would remain, a new house of oversight would ensure more balance for the views of the other nations which make up the UK.)

What a squandered opportunity by the current Queen to make hers a truly democratic mark on the nation!

Very valid point with regards to the House of Lords reform that was started by Tony Blair & has yet to be completed by David Cameron.

Interesting point I would also point out is that Canada's Upper House - The senate is also an appointed Chamber, both countries have tried for at least 15 years to reform their upper house but have got nowhere due to disagreeing to method of election & the number of members to the respective upper houses.

I agree with your comments & hopefully one day both parliaments will have fully elected upper houses accountable to the people.

On a side note, I have really enjoyed reading the comments so far posted on this Thread on the Scottish Referendum & will make for interesting conversation In the weeks to come.

 

[PLANT]

I'm calling it now... No wins

 

[Clivem]

I'm calling it now... No wins

What ...... so no improvement to the Gleneagles rates ...... ????

 

[Cruiser Elite]

I agree with your comments & hopefully one day both parliaments will have fully elected upper houses accountable to the people.

Yes that is the perfect model - just look at the fabulous scenario we have in Canberra right now!

 

[dk4]

... just look at the fabulous scenario we have in Canberra right now!

I believe that the Australian Senate does act as a true house of review, and temperance on the two major political parties, which rule the swing in the house below them.

Consider the proposition that a two part political system is, in effect, quite similar to a communist one! :shock:

Both (communist and two party political system advocates) claim democratic validity by virtue of a binary choice -
Communism: a Yes or No vote
Two Party System: a Party A or Party B vote

While I may not necessarily personally agree with the views of the Greens, the Palmer United Party, or any other minors - I believe that they do ensure that our parliament does not become a binary farce, when our society is any thing but. (Although, there is always room for improvement, especially when you see the likes of Motor Enthusiasts elected with little practical primary support.)

The Australian Parliament is a place for negotiation and compromise, which I think is a fairly good place for such things to occur.

 

[drron]

Right now I would call our system a binary farce.
With Palmer as the supreme decider of policy with his ideas changing from day to day surely is a great example of farce.

 

[alieninperth]

That is exactly what I was thinking DK4 although you put in a much more elegant from that I could. At least you are able to vote out the senators, unlike the unelected and previously inheritated seats that exist(ed) in the house of lords.

 

[Cruiser Elite]

Current Senate make up? Fabulous representation of the peoples choice! Give me a break:

Muir's party fluked after polling just 0.51% of the vote last September. The Motoring Enthusiasts Party polled 17,122 first preference at an election where the quota for election was 483,076 votes.

Antony Green's Election Blog: Ricky Muir's Strange Path to the Senate

 

[Warks]

Current Senate make up? Fabulous representation of the peoples choice! Give me a break:

Muir's party fluked after polling just 0.51% of the vote last September. The Motoring Enthusiasts Party polled 17,122 first preference at an election where the quota for election was 483,076 votes.

Antony Green's Election Blog: Ricky Muir's Strange Path to the Senate

Unrepresentative swill as Paul Keating once said.

 

[amaroo]

Current Senate make up? Fabulous representation of the peoples choice! Give me a break:

[Muir's party fluked after polling just 0.51% of the vote last September. The Motoring Enthusiasts Party polled 17,122 first preference at an election where the quota for election was 483,076 votes./QUOTE]

Antony Green's Election Blog: Ricky Muir's Strange Path to the Senate

It's not limited to the senate!

Candidate	Party	Votes	%	Swing (%)
HOLT, Mike	One Nation	709	0.84	+0.84
BYRNES, Trudy	Independent	1,016	1.20	+1.20
PALMER, Clive Frederick	Palmer United Party	22,409	26.49	+26.49
O'BRIEN, Ted	Liberal National Party of Queensland	34,959	41.32	-8.13
MEYER, Angela	Family First	1,416	1.67	-3.57
HUGHES, Elaine Lexie	Australian Labor Party	15,429	18.24	-9.07
KNOBEL, David	The Greens	7,046	8.33	-9.67
SAWYER, Ray	Katter's Australian Party	1,623	1.92	+1.92
FORMAL		84,607	94.88	-0.09
INFORMAL		4,569	5.12	+0.09
TOTAL		89,176	93.39	+0.61

Candidate	Party	Votes	Margin	This Election (%)	Last Election (%)	Swing (%)
PALMER, Clive Frederick	Palmer United Party	42,330	53	50.03	0.00	+50.03
O'BRIEN, Ted	Liberal National Party of Queensland	42,277	-53	49.97	0.00	+49.97

 

[dk4]

It's not limited to the senate!

Moving from discussions about proportional representation in the Senate, to our preferential system in the House of Representatives - I think that we have a reasonable democratic approach there too, because it enables us to vote as much for who we don't want elected, as who we do.

In the example given, more than half (50.03%) of the electorate didn't want the LNP candidate elected, even though he won the most primary votes on absolute numbers, so he wasn't elected.

 

[amaroo]

Moving from discussions about proportional representation in the Senate, to our preferential system in the House of Representatives - I think that we have a reasonable democratic approach there too, because it enables us to vote as much for who we don't want elected, as who we do.

In the example given, more than half (50.03%) of the electorate didn't want the LNP candidate elected, even though he won the most primary votes on absolute numbers, so he wasn't elected.

But we ALL ended up with Clive

 

[whatmeworry]

I don't care who beats Palmer in the next election as he has too many business conflicts which is making a mockery of this parliament.

 

[Cruiser Elite]

But we ALL ended up with Clive

Yes please don't remind - a certain group of Banana Benders need take a long hard look at themselves!