Qantas workers prepare to strike

Discussion in 'Open Discussion' started by Yada Yada, Feb 24, 2006.

Tags:
  1. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    8
    1F
    This has been brewing for a while now. I wonder if QF have been delaying the decision until close to the Commonwealth Games to raise the stakes with the union?
    Registered Users don't see this and have the option of removing all other advertisements.  Register HERE
     
  2. Dave Noble

    Dave Noble Senior Member

    Oct 10, 2005
    6,419
    8
    They could be trying to delay it so that when they do announce it, it will be too close to the Games for them to arrange a strike during that period


    Dave
     
  3. NM

    NM
    Moderator

    Aug 27, 2004
    15,698
    1,179
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    and won't striking just show everyone why Qantas needs to move the work away from the local Unions?
     
  4. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    8
    1F
    It would certainly make the unions look bad, which is perhaps why QF may be delaying the announcement. Clever play if that's the case. But I guess the unions might not care given what's at stake - their livelihood and existence.

    There are lots of empty seats on O7 just waiting to be filled if QF is grounded.
     
  5. shillard

    shillard Guest

    You would think that the communist fools might have learned their lesson from Ansett.

    Rule #1 of survival - don't foul your own nest. These clowns can't even take a hint from across the Pacific (gee, why ARE so many US Airlines hitting the wall? 9/11? I don't think so, Tim.....).

    Hopefully Dixon will fire the lot of the bludgers out of spite and give the work to people who are actually prepared to WORK.
     
  6. dajop

    dajop Senior Member

    Jul 1, 2002
    7,961
    1,582
    SIN
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Lot might be a bit of an exaggeration .... 7 flights of a 60 seat aircraft running @50% load factor is not enough to take the pax of just 1 767 flight.

    I think SQ could make some mileage out of it .... bet there already planning which aircraft they could divert here to transport stranded pax ..
     
  7. MIKEs

    MIKEs Junior Member

    Dec 15, 2005
    13
    0
    Ha, Dixon & co are only interested in Lining there own pockets they dont give a rats about there staff, hence wanting to move more jobs offshore, Why is it that QF has such an envious safety record??? Because its been performed by highly skilled trades people here in Australia :!: Not in some backlot in China or some other far flung outpost.
     
  8. aus_flyer

    aus_flyer Established Member

    Feb 15, 2005
    1,361
    25
    Brisbane
    Inside word on good authority is that maintenance will be moving offshore. The decision has been made - just not announced.
     
  9. Gazza

    Gazza Member

    Feb 5, 2006
    122
    1
    I have a high opinion of Qantas staff, I cannot say the same about the senior management.

    Their is no prize in the race for the lowest common denominator.
     
  10. shillard

    shillard Guest

    So what, yellow men can't maintain planes as well as white men? Bloody racist.

    They want to move more jobs offshore because lazy bludger Australians continue to foul their own nest.

    Because while QF is profitable, it is only so by airline standards. It can't hold a candle to businesses in other sectors.

    Because lazy union bludgers want to drag everyone down to the lowest common denominator (witness the useless scrotes in dispute with Boeing @ Williamtown - terrified of an employment contract where higher performers are paid more, because that inevitably means the inverse also applies).

    Who could blame them?
     
  11. Gazza

    Gazza Member

    Feb 5, 2006
    122
    1
    Shillard

    What make you assume that it will be MEN who maintain the planes? - bloody sexist

    As a Kiwi I cant find it in me to stick up for Australians (unless you are from a non-ANZAC country).

    If Qantas is such a bad business, suggest you start by giving the manager's a bullocking. They set the direction and tone of the organisation.

    The vast majority of Qantas staff I have dealt with are excellent!
     
  12. Guest

    Guest Guest

    haha (y)
     
  13. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    37,610
    7,514
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    Don't we support China's economy enough already?
     
  14. one9

    one9 Active Member

    Sep 14, 2005
    590
    8
    it is two way. china will support our economy by lowering costs and allowing qantas to provide greater returns to many australian shareholders, and australia will support china by providing more jobs for workers.

    this is a great thing.

    reducing costs is increasing efficiency. in fact by reducing costs, qantas, if they wanted could put more into safety and maitanence by spending the same dollars but getting higher quality parts and equipment (as less needs to be spent on wages).

    the less of qantas's workforce that is unionised the better. this way qantas will operate with less disruptions from strikes and us as passengers will face less disruptions.
     
  15. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    37,610
    7,514
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    Agree with what you say but can't help thinking how Chinese products are cheap and inferior. Doesn't matter what you buy, whether it be clothes, appliances, household equipment, spare parts etc there is no quality, they do not last. I suppose you get what you pay for but.... I try to avoid Chinese products as much as possible and like to spend a little more to get a better quality product manufactured elsewhere, Japan, Germany, Sweden.

    Will this be reflected in the maintenance? Cutting corners? Cheap parts used even though premium parts may be paid for by QF?

    Suppose we will never know unless they get a chance to prove themselves. That decision is in the hands of others and I hope they are making the decision for the right reasons and do not sacriface safety just to save a few bucks that will only end up back in the executives hands as a bonus anyway.
     
  16. Guest

    Guest Guest

    does this mean QF will have the same awesome quality maintanence workers that Air China does?
     
  17. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    8
    1F
    Yes, you're right. Although I was thinking of it from O7's perspective. 8)
     
  18. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    8
    1F
    Your comments would be fair if management applied the same standard to themselves. They are very highly paid - witness the recently departed head of IT who was on an enormous salary (>$1 million, IIRC). Not saying there is anything wrong with that in principle, but by your own admission QF "...can't hold a candle to businesses in other sectors" so perhaps it is time for a cleanout at the top.
     
  19. JohnK

    JohnK Veteran Member

    Mar 22, 2005
    37,610
    7,514
    BNE, SYD and CNX
    I think you are right. Rather than getting rid of more pawns the time might be right to clean out some top management.

    A few years ago I received a notice for the AGM from a medium sized company I have shares in and noticed that one of the motions was to grant the managing director $750,000 worth of options "as incentive to perform his duties in the coming year". I thought his $2 million salary was incentive enough.
     
  20. oz_mark

    oz_mark Enthusiast

    Jun 30, 2002
    16,875
    1,486
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Qantas shift hurts safety image: poll

    There's a report in the Australian about how the safety image of Qantas will be hurt by shifting the maintenance overseas. See http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18281420%255E2702,00.html


     
Loading...

Share This Page