markis10
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 32,313
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Sapphire

There are plenty of QF lemmings happy to pay. and wouldn’t even consider cheaper and better optionsYes, if the pax keep paying for the cough international product, the airline will keep charging for it, and keep putting the aircraft on medium haul international routes.
OMaaT has a look
Qantas A321XLR Makes International Debut, And Travelers Won’t Be Happy
How could the airline in good conscious charge the same for a recliner Vs flat bed in J - overnight? He's spot on with the sentence after the graphic. Yes, if the pax keep paying for the cough international product, the airline will keep charging for it, and keep putting the aircraft on medium haul international routes.
View attachment 499259
The only thing that forced Qantas to go to Lay Flat seating on their Domestic A330's was VA's Coast to Coast service.There are plenty of QF lemmings happy to pay. and wouldn’t even consider cheaper and better options
I'm not sure people are aware yet. It takes a little bit of time for this sort of news to permeate.OMaaT has a look
Qantas A321XLR Makes International Debut, And Travelers Won’t Be Happy
How could the airline in good conscious charge the same for a recliner Vs flat bed in J - overnight? He's spot on with the sentence after the graphic. Yes, if the pax keep paying for the cough international product, the airline will keep charging for it, and keep putting the aircraft on medium haul international routes.
View attachment 499259
I suspect you are on the money here.I have flown on QF97 in J a few times since the current timetable was adopted late last year and it actually works quite well as a connection from MEL. However, i suspect it was relatively lightly patronized, especially in J, which may be why they it has been selected for this massive downgrade. No way on earth would I be interested in flying on one if these things for 7-8 hours.
Ill be honest BNE - MNL was a legitimate consideration for flying to HND connecting onto JL's MNL - HND flight.I suspect you are on the money here.
The 20 seats will likely be filled by sale fares or FF bookings. Anyone paying full whack will likely be last minute..: and paying for the convenience and a seat to get them there as fast as possible.
Or if they have more time, they’ll fly PR.
I can't find a photo, but here is a PDF seatmap for the 42 business seat Zone A cabin. (These days the 332 has 22 business seats in the same zone.)I'll see if I can dig up a photo of their 2010 short lived 2x3x2 38" pitch business seating.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Here they are:I can't find a photo, but here is a PDF seatmap for the 42 business seat Zone A cabin. (These days the 332 has 22 business seats in the same zone.)
I think thats the earlier 36/38 seat version with 6 rows, row 1 being 2x2x2.Although the fabric was updated to grey later on, and then they also flew for a while with the middle seat in the centre blocked!
It was still very tight![]()
I think you’re right. But it still gives the idea of the set up.I think thats the earlier 36/38 seat version with 6 rows, row 1 being 2x2x2.
Ah I missed this clearly but I guess that makes some sense and would free up a wide body for a higher yield market. PAL also flies an A321neo on the route so it's not like theres stiff competition, except PAL has 31 fewer seats on their jets...
Would you if they did?I have no interest in travelling on a QFi A321 that lacks proper J lie flat seats.
