Quickstatus
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 18,141
I have never why breakfast has to be different to lunch and dinner. So much simpler if food is time agnosticFood is food?
I have never why breakfast has to be different to lunch and dinner. So much simpler if food is time agnosticFood is food?
You mean you don’t like having three breakfasts flying MEL-LAX (lounge, plane, lounge)?I have never why breakfast has to be different to lunch and dinner. So much simpler if food is time agnostic
You mean you don’t like having three breakfasts flying MEL-LAX (lounge, plane, lounge)?
No - it was stated as a belief, not a fact (“So I believe so far. …)And I'll likewise ask you to substantiate that.
No - it was stated as a belief, not a fact (“So I believe so far. …)
The Quest extract you mentioned doesn’t say that the ULR won’t be priced at a premium to standard air frame - they can stick the R&D cost anywhere they choose but then what they price the final product at is different - but if it is price exactly the same as all the other A350–1000s then good on Qantas! But like I say, the usefulness of the ULR generally versus the standard airframe is very limited. Why would you buy a custom-built plane with extended range and lower seat capacity if you don’t need it? Even if you say okay we won’t use the extra fuel tank and will put more seats in – why wouldn’t you buy the standard air frame which has a lot more proven capability?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
. No I mean why can't I have the dinner menu at breakfast and say the breakfast menu at dinner?
