Qantas Project Sunrise goes ahead, 12 new A350-1000s ordered

I
This is the interesting thing to me. Qantas, who I am sure have done their research, expect to charge a premium for a direct flight. But as a seasoned Y traveller, I'd want a discount.
Its completely possible Y isn't any more expensive. Ultimately the flight's financial success will mostly be made up at the front of the plane.
 
I

Its completely possible Y isn't any more expensive. Ultimately the flight's financial success will mostly be made up at the front of the plane.

A lot of posts on AFF talk about an additional 20% above any current fares.

My reading of the CEOs most recent statement is that PS fares will be in line with what is already charged for a non stop LHR ticket ie PER-LHR.
 
This is the interesting thing to me. Qantas, who I am sure have done their research, expect to charge a premium for a direct flight. But as a seasoned Y traveller, I'd want a discount.
There’ll be CRs.

Win-Win. QF reduce their points balance obligation and some members dodge toasters.
 
This is the interesting thing to me. Qantas, who I am sure have done their research, expect to charge a premium for a direct flight. But as a seasoned Y traveller, I'd want a discount.
Absolutely, the appeal will be to those flying in the premium cabins with a lie-flat bed to sleep half the flight and not be woken in the middle of it for a stopover.

For those flying down the back, 21 hours upright in an economy seat? Not worth a 20% premium over a 23 hour trip (including an hour stopover somewhere like Singapore or Dubai). The trip's not even 10% faster.
 
Absolutely, the appeal will be to those flying in the premium cabins with a lie-flat bed to sleep half the flight.

For those flying down the back, 21 hours upright in an economy seat? Not worth a 20% premium over a 23 hour trip (including an hour stopover somewhere like Singapore or Dubai). The trip's not even 10% faster.
There is argument on say JFK - SYD. If you consider when QF4 currently lands into AKL (~4am local or 2am AEST). This is exactly when you'd want to try to get some sleep to adjust your jetlag a bit.
 
I agree on that, coming back from NY I'd always prefer to go via DFW or LAX because the timing of the QF4 AKL stopover is brutal for jetlag - waking you for landing around 2am Sydney time.

That timing is far more important to me than a slightly shorter flight time. So what if the flight saves an hour travel time (and an annoying US terminal transfer) if you'll be a zombie for an extra day after getting back.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

There is argument on say JFK - SYD. If you consider when QF4 currently lands into AKL (~4am local or 2am AEST). This is exactly when you'd want to try to get some sleep to adjust your jetlag a bit.
Yep. We’re looking to book SYD-JFK (return) for later next year and was kinda hoping the return was subbed for a PS flight.

I guess we’ll ponder how to get a PS flight to LHR some time later.
 
Yes, definitely.

I disagree. I’d rather one and done. 9 hours can be surprisingly long when that’s all you’ve planned for the first leg - and then you’ve got an even longer second leg awaiting.

I find you generally come to terms with the flight you are boarding, which is why a 4 hour can seem long. If you’ve settled in and accepted your fate for a 14 hour flight, adding the 7 hours, but eliminating the second flight and the transit is not such a bad thing.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top