Qantas Project Sunrise goes ahead, 12 new A350-1000s ordered

[dajop]

Maybe LHR, CDG and FCO might be it

Perhaps JFK as well?

 

[jase05]

Perhaps JFK as well?

Yes, I should have stated European destinations.

 

[Doddler]

Yep, it’s definitely the way forward for QF.
Be interesting to see what their end game is and how many Sunrise destinations they end up with in 5-10 years time. Maybe LHR, CDG and FCO might be it

They need to be premium/business destinations I guess. I'm a bit surprised Rome is on that list on that basis, rather than Frankfurt or Munich, though of course Rome is a far bigger tourist and family visit destination for Australians. As would be Greece, so maybe that's a future option.

Ah, and just as I was writing that, I come across an article out just today on Executive Traveller (not linked as imagine it's a competitor to this fine site), in which Qantas International CEO Cam Wallace says:

“There’s a whole bunch of markets like Greece and Germany that we’ve flown to before on a connecting basis that we’ll look at (for direct flights),”

 

[elanshin]

Be interesting to see what their end game is and how many Sunrise destinations they end up with in 5-10 years time. Maybe LHR, CDG and FCO might be it

Forgot the other side of the pond. JFK definitely, but other cities like ORD might get a look in too.

 

[Doddler]

Forgot the other side of the pond. JFK definitely, but other cities like ORD might get a look in too.

Same article I mentioned above said they're considering Seattle, Chicago and Vegas.

 

[jase05]

Same article I mentioned above said they're considering Seattle, Chicago and Vegas.

They don’t need Sunrise aircraft for them though do they?
Nothing stopping QF flying there now if they really wanted to

 

[dajop]

They need to be premium/business destinations I guess. I'm a bit surprised Rome is on that list on that basis, rather than Frankfurt or Munich, though of course Rome is a far bigger tourist and family visit destination for Australians. As would be Greece, so maybe that's a future option.

Rome is barely served by SQ, and isn't by CX, which would suggest the premium traffic perhaps isn't that compelling. Would have though FRA or even ZRH might have supported more premium traffic.

Same article I mentioned above said they're considering Seattle, Chicago and Vegas.

Seattle and Vegas surely wouldn't need Sunrise aircraft, if the 787's can go to DFW, they can certainly make it to either SEA or LAS. ORD they can from BNE (it was going to launch until COVID hit(), but SYD seemed a stretch IIRC.

 

[jase05]

Seattle and Vegas surely wouldn't need Sunrise aircraft, if the 787's can go to DFW, they can surely make it to either SEA or LAS?

Yep, they already fly to YVR too so SEA and LAS would easily be doable if they wanted.
ORD might be a tad too far

 

[Doddler]

They don’t need Sunrise aircraft for them though do they?
Nothing stopping QF flying there now if they really wanted to

I imagine they need at least 787s to make it economically viable. Right now I guess they don't have sufficient aircraft.

 

[moa999]

Qantas only have 12 Sunrise aircraft. They get used up very quickly on these long routes, and you need certain route characteristics to support the high number of F and J seats, which you in turn need to make the aircraft fly the diatance.

SYD-LHR and MEL-LHR will be 22-23 hours.
Ergo a full return trip with time for load and unload will be over two days..
So you need three aircraft each just for daily SYD-LHR and MEL-LHR.. that's half the fleet gone with some maintenance time built in. Add PER-LHR is another two, SYD-JFK another two and you're pretty much done with one aircraft in near constant maintenance.

What Qantas will have is more spare 787s and so I think you might see more use of SIN as a scissor hub. 787 from MEL, BNE, 380 from SYD, XLR from ADL and then onto say CDG, FRA, LHR and BOM respectively.

 

[RB001]

Rome is barely served by SQ, and isn't by CX,

CX to Rome is similar to Qantas - a few days a week roughly April-October.

 

[dajop]

SYD-LHR and MEL-LHR will be 22-23 hours.

Don't think it changes the maths around the plane requirements but flying time SYD-LHR should be <22 hrs and LHR-SYD <20 hrs.

If you add SYD-PER + PER-LHR it comes to about 21:40 flying time (and 20:10 or thereabouts in the other direction). Repeat these calculations with SYD-DXB+DXB-LHR or SYD-DOH+DOH-LHR you get similar results or even less.

Of course you've got to add in ground time at either end, but you also eliminate one approach and one take off.