docjames
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2007
- Posts
- 9,498
- Qantas
- LT Gold
You’d think the airport operator would be trying to facilitate more flights (and thereby earn more revenue) rather than be obstructive.
QF have made the SYD Dom—> Int connection as “seamless” as possible, but let’s face it, it’s still a PITA compared to being able to walk. Also, losing (potentially) up to an hour of aircraft time to tow from one terminal to the other is nuts.
But it seems to be a continued play-out of the QF v PER saga of terminal coalescence. At what point does PER realise QF is effectively it’s “customer” and they should be trying to help it?
Perhaps those from the west know more / can enlighten further.
QF have made the SYD Dom—> Int connection as “seamless” as possible, but let’s face it, it’s still a PITA compared to being able to walk. Also, losing (potentially) up to an hour of aircraft time to tow from one terminal to the other is nuts.
But it seems to be a continued play-out of the QF v PER saga of terminal coalescence. At what point does PER realise QF is effectively it’s “customer” and they should be trying to help it?
Perhaps those from the west know more / can enlighten further.