Laptop Jockey
Intern
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2021
- Posts
- 78
Thankyou Eminere.Yes, see here.
Thankyou Eminere.Yes, see here.
Same. Don't think the site is all that great. Given in the same incident Vietnam airlines is mentioned but not Qantas.Qantas says my details hacked, but the haveibeenpwned site report zero hacks on that email.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
As mentioned above, it’s because of the injunction. The site isnt allowed, legally, to publish that information.Same. Don't think the site is all that great. Given in the same incident Vietnam airlines is mentioned but not Qantas.
Thanks. I didn't connect those dots. I think such action is shameful. Publishing actual personal data - of course. But 'banning' publication of information about whether that data has been used, is treating us with contempt.As mentioned above, it’s because of the injunction. The site isnt allowed, legally, to publish that information.
Ah. Never realised it was operated under an Australian ABN.It's clearly owned and operated by an Australian entity, the geographic location of the hosting is irrelevant AFAIK.
What I suppose they’re trying to stop is someone accessing the data… from DV cases through to celebrities or other categories… and publishing that. One thing to be on the dark web, but most of us wouldn’t access that.Thanks. I didn't connect those dots. I think such action is shameful. Publishing actual personal data - of course. But 'banning' publication of information about whether that data has been used, is treating us with contempt.
I was listening today to a cyber expertWhat I suppose they’re trying to stop is someone accessing the data… from DV cases through to celebrities or other categories… and publishing that. One thing to be on the dark web, but most of us wouldn’t access that.