Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,484
No doubt from 2015, the delayed Terminal 4 at MEL will be an improvement on the current arrangements for TT passengers who must contend with a lengthy walk to their aircraft sitting on the tarmac near some of the freight forwarders, or the 'prison like' walk through the turnstiles upon arriving in MEL and collecting one's bags.
It may also be better for JQ passengers whose aircraft will presumably have access to a greater number of aircraft gates. It's so bad at present that JQ staff call the limited number of gates (or adjacent tarmac) available 'the alleyway' with resultant delays for JQ making it the least punctual domestic airline.
True, it will be brand spanking new.
There are some negatives.
If passenger growth at MEL picks up further, road access will be even harder at peak times, despite what nlagalle correctly says is the airport's investment (as that AFFer said, Melbourne Airport is not standing still). That, however, has been covered in another AFF thread.
The one thing that struck me most about the artist's impression of the new terminal was a simple thing.
It may not strike many of you as important, but one of the many factors that distinguish SIN Changi from some other airports is the almost constant presence of carpet under one's feet.
Sure, it goes against the trend in MEL (and other Australian airports). The VA terminal at MEL had carpet when it was VA: MEL airport management ripped it up and installed tiling, which is hard on the feet. Pity the airport staff (such as those pushing wheelchairs) who have to walk up and down a fair bit during the day.
Carpet may be costlier to clean. It may show hard to remove stains. It may attract dust.
But overall, it wins for me because of how it makes walking easier (with any noise deadening properties being an added bonus).
How I wish MEL would show some sense and follow SIN and other airports that have carpet not hard tiling as the surface of preference.
It may also be better for JQ passengers whose aircraft will presumably have access to a greater number of aircraft gates. It's so bad at present that JQ staff call the limited number of gates (or adjacent tarmac) available 'the alleyway' with resultant delays for JQ making it the least punctual domestic airline.
True, it will be brand spanking new.
There are some negatives.
If passenger growth at MEL picks up further, road access will be even harder at peak times, despite what nlagalle correctly says is the airport's investment (as that AFFer said, Melbourne Airport is not standing still). That, however, has been covered in another AFF thread.
The one thing that struck me most about the artist's impression of the new terminal was a simple thing.
It may not strike many of you as important, but one of the many factors that distinguish SIN Changi from some other airports is the almost constant presence of carpet under one's feet.
Sure, it goes against the trend in MEL (and other Australian airports). The VA terminal at MEL had carpet when it was VA: MEL airport management ripped it up and installed tiling, which is hard on the feet. Pity the airport staff (such as those pushing wheelchairs) who have to walk up and down a fair bit during the day.
Carpet may be costlier to clean. It may show hard to remove stains. It may attract dust.
But overall, it wins for me because of how it makes walking easier (with any noise deadening properties being an added bonus).
How I wish MEL would show some sense and follow SIN and other airports that have carpet not hard tiling as the surface of preference.