Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,486
Every so often, longstanding aviation journalist Ben Sandilands launches into criticism of AirServices Australia's training of air traffic controllers, which he alleges is deficient:
Qantas, Tigerair, make Hay the wrong way at abt 36,000 feet | Plane Talking
The consequences of an air traffic controller making a mistake could be serious. That said, aircraft have inbuilt safety features that they may not have had 30 or 40 years ago to try to ensure that they remain separated from one another.
It must be a very stressful and highly technical job, irrespective as to how good MAESTRO and other computer systems are. At times (although not in the last year if I recall) there have been allegations that Australian air traffic controllers take too many sick days or that there are or have been insufficient staff on deck per shift.
'Near misses' in the air and safety problems on the ground are taken seriously by ATSB, as they should be.
Is Mr Sandilands' criticism fair, is it understated (i.e. the situation is even worse than what he describes) or is it hyperbolic?
Qantas, Tigerair, make Hay the wrong way at abt 36,000 feet | Plane Talking
The consequences of an air traffic controller making a mistake could be serious. That said, aircraft have inbuilt safety features that they may not have had 30 or 40 years ago to try to ensure that they remain separated from one another.
It must be a very stressful and highly technical job, irrespective as to how good MAESTRO and other computer systems are. At times (although not in the last year if I recall) there have been allegations that Australian air traffic controllers take too many sick days or that there are or have been insufficient staff on deck per shift.
'Near misses' in the air and safety problems on the ground are taken seriously by ATSB, as they should be.
Is Mr Sandilands' criticism fair, is it understated (i.e. the situation is even worse than what he describes) or is it hyperbolic?
Last edited: