Hard to see this one having wings in this forum.
I read online that with reference to the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize was that Greta was advocating that airplanes contributed hugely to climate change and for that reason amongst others was why the jet setters who awarded the prize would not award it to Greta. But given the way the world is turning these days maybe flying really is a target now.Hard to see this one having wings in this forum.
Google "Global Dimming". The world is getting dimmer - in some areas 22% dimmer than in 1950. This is what is counteracting global warming. Google "Global Dimming 9/11". Following up on a theory, it was shown that in the 3 days of no flights over the USA following 9/11, the effect of not having contrails reduced global dimming by 1%. In other words, flying is part of the solution to global warming - the condensation trails reflect sunlight back into space. The reason the dire predictions of "An inconvenient truth" haven't occurred is that global dimming has counteracted the effects of global warming. So we should be flying more.
Although, with the cleanup of smog (and removal of aerosols), we're back to global brightening
The amount of smog needed to counteract warming would probably kill most of us!