I'm fascinated by these comments.
1) A lounge being 'boring' (and 'very boring' in the case of The Wing F). What would make it 'not boring'? Jugglers? Flame eaters? Donkey rides? There are seats, a restaurant, a bar, showers, TVs, internet and a small library. What need they do to keep your interest up in an airport lounge? How about (to quote Basil Fawlty) Krakatoa erupting on the horizon?
2) And about not being 'impressed by champagne bars or cabanas'. I use a cabana to have a shower (or a bath if I'm so minded) and I use a champagne bar to have a glass or two of champagne; if they manage those, I'm happy. What else do these facilities need to offer to impress you?
Sure, each to their own, but those who express 'boredom' or 'rubbish' with respect to an airport lounge which on any objective measure is one of the better ones around the globe just strikes me as a bit of self absorption.
Would waiters delivering food and bev while riding on unicycles get them over the line?