- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Posts
- 48,103
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Late last month, AA opened a Flagship Lounge in JFK bringing the total to four. These are at LAX, ORD, LHR & JFK.
More pertinent information about why only four:
Here are some reasons for closing the DFW F/L this edited from a post on FT:
More pertinent information about why only four:
There also used to be a F/L in terminal A at DFW but this was closed.nm said:They used to have Flagship lounges at BOS and MIA as well, but they have all closed in the last few years, with only ORD, LAX and LHR remaining. [edit: and now JFK]
Here are some reasons for closing the DFW F/L this edited from a post on FT:
ESpen36(FT) said:The FL is designed to be a lounge for full-fare First Class passengers traveling to Europe, Asia, and South America. AA grudging lets in EXPs (flying to/from/through these locations and MEX) because it has to do so thanks to OW agreements.
Many of those international services ...[ex DFW] above are operated with a 763, and therefore no First Class section. Thus, DFW has nowhere near the number of paying full-fare F international passengers as ORD, and definitely nowhere near JFK!
I agree that given all of the EXPs and other AA elites who are based out of DFW, the FL would be flooded all the time with mileage redeemers and EXPs traveling internationally. It would be too much revenue exposure, given that the FL is exclusively a PERK, not a membership club like the AC. AA doesn't make any additional money when an AA passenger or elite walks in.
Finally, ... there's nobody else to help pay for the FL at DFW. At LAX, QF pays a very significant portion of the FL's operational costs (the other OW airlines help out, every time a non-AA OW Emerald walks in). JFK is the highest-yield station in the AA network (the most number of full-fare premium international pax), so it deserves a FL. LHR gets one because of significant premium yields as well. ORD needs a FL for competitive reasonss.