AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
It comes from this video:This is a stock image.
The article explains AHRC terminated the case because no settlement between the parties could be reached. They're not a court, so can't impose/determine outcomes, or achieve a resolution between two parties beyond conciliation when both parties couldn't reach an agreement. It said they found the claims "reasonably arguable".
Claim against Bain and DFAT lack substance, but those against Virgin may still have substance.Did you not read the following sentence
“She found the claims against Bain and DFAT lacked substance.”
