Entry into USA | Australian Frequent Flyer
Australian Frequent Flyer

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource since 1998!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.

Joining AFF is fast, simple & absolutely free - register now and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)

Entry into USA

Status
Not open for further replies.

icemann

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
268
I don't know how others have found it, but I have the following common findings from my trips to the USA :-

After 9-11, entering the USA is now like trying to enter a fortress. If you hadn't had enough at (in)security, get ready to get searched at the gate too. Even flying DOM is a pain. I hope oz never ever ends up like this. oz security is FAR more civilised (and efficient) than this.

You get 'wanded' (metal detector) after walking through the stand up one, be ready to remove your shoes and get your feet wanded. If the TSA go and search your bag (you'll know if you're lucky, because you'll get SSSS on your boarding pass), leave it unlocked and DON'T go touching it, they get rather upset :) Mine asked me what a copy of Pl@yboy was doing there, so I told her it was the inflight magazine ;)

Leave the checked baggage unlocked so the TSA can go and check that you're not carrying any naughty things in it :) Or you'll end up with broken samsonite combination locks. :(

Be ready to show the US immigration a return or onward plane ticket, and state why you're there. They seem to be paranoid that you'll stay there as an illegal immigrant.

AA lounges are good, but IMHO, QF lounges have the edge. But AA lounges have cocktails. The showers are o.k. too, but in LAX DOM, it took 1 hour at 1200 to get 15 minutes. So pass the cocktails.

And don't expect the priority baggage handling to have any effect. According to my last flight, it was supposed to come in on number 5, but the priority was mixed with the normal luggage and EVERYTHING went everywhere, and DIDN'T come off first.
 

redrat

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
225
Jeez Icemann I thought all the talk on FT was a little overdone about the luggage locks having to be left unlocked and was for airports other than LAX.
Are we to believe that our luggage is now safe from pilferers because of the security checks the TSA has on its own members for employment?
I think the smartly packed carry-on(s) has to be the best way to travel through the USA now. That is unless your checked luggage is packed with the uninteresting so that no-one wants to steal it.
Unfortunately for me, I usually pack all the spare heavy stuff into the checked luggage. :(
 

icemann

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
268
Hi Redrat,

Well, I didn't seem to have any problem when I went MEL-LAX (and actually locked my bags with Samsonite combination locks). They didn't break them, but I wonder how they managed to guess the combination from 9999 possible ones ?

You also get a little flyer inside it (I still have mine as a souvenir) from the TSA, and it says "As part of this process (baggage inspection) some bags are opened and physically inspected. Your bag was among those selected for physical inspection"

Lucky me. It was probably all the boxes containing my tie clips / belts / ties that they looked at. The x-ray machines are probably fitted with Hugo Boss detectors :D

"During the inspection, your bag and it's contents may have been searched for prohibited items. At the completion of the inspection, the contents were returned to your bag, which was then resealed."

Yes. It was. With CABLE TIES ! :roll:

"If the TSA screener was unable to open your bag for inspection because it was locked, the screener may have been forced to break the locks on your bag. TSA sincerely regrets having to do this, and has taken care to reseal your bag upon completion of inspection. However, TSA is not liable for damage to your locks resulting from this necessary security precaution." (verbatim from the flyer that I got from LAX-CHI-ALB)

www.TSATravelTips.us

I'm not being pessimistic, but I'm not sure if we can trust the TSA not to go and steal things. I mean, a tie clip, a money clip, something small is easy to secrete in your pockets.

I agree in that the smartly packed (and make it easily accessible, in case you get the fateful SSSS on your boarding pass) carry on is the best way to go. I got SSSS on my boarding pass, and had to be wanded down (even though I'm Caucasian, white and blonde haired). Virtually anyone who resembled Middle-Eastern or Indian appearance was pulled in straight away into the same line.

Anything REMOTELY valuable goes into the carry on. I try not to put expensive things in the check-in, unless it is absolutely necessary.
 

dajop

AFF Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Messages
9,131
Flights
My Map
icemann said:
Hi Redrat,
Anything REMOTELY valuable goes into the carry on. I try not to put expensive things in the check-in, unless it is absolutely necessary.
Nothing new about that. Every bit of advice I've ever read suggest the same thing, and that well and truly pre-dates the current increased security
 

Rossmurdoch

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Messages
43
Last time I was in the US (Feb 03) I found the security far more thorough (read paranoid) in LAX than JFK
 

Gary Steiger

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
20
TSA Website

The TSA web site is at http://www.tsa.gov/public/ . It provides good advice on how to speed up the process.

Re, shoes: Lately its a good idea to just take them off and put them through the x-ray. Could save you a full body search. I heard a TSA guy actually thank a patron for doing this.

Re: luggage locks. Don't use them. They might get cut off. Most are useless to prevent theft, anyway. Any 8 year old could pick them. Instead, to keep your luggage from opening inadvertently, use those plastic security ties that don't come off without cutting them. Then be sure you have the means of cutting them when you arrive. (And don't carry those means on your carry on, of course. Cutty things are a no no. Put them in the one pocket on your checked luggage that isn't secured by one of the ties.)

Of course you should not check valuables. Yes, there has been some theft by TSA employees, and the TSA is concerned and increasing security observation of TSA people handling checked luggage. But the theft risk by security employees or the airlines exists in any airport in the world. So protect yourself by not checking valuables.

Yes, we Americans are paranoid about people hijacking airplanes. We had a few people killed about two years ago by planes flying into buildings, remember? Hopefully you can keep your government from pissing people off so much that they would do such a thing to you.
 

redrat

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
225
Re: TSA Website

Gary Steiger said:
...Yes, we Americans are paranoid about people hijacking airplanes. We had a few people killed about two years ago by planes flying into buildings, remember? Hopefully you can keep your government from pissing people off so much that they would do such a thing to you.
Gary, we as the flying public have no trouble with our memory. It's just that the USA went from the "security joke" to the "security nightmare". Other countries already had a semblance of security that tended to reassure most of us in the industry. However, travelling the US by air was a joke pre-911.
Everywhere around here flying internationally has only had to make a few changes when not travelling to the US but when you see the big screens and barricades and extra x-ray machines, you don't have to look at the gate to know it's a flight to the USA. :cry:
 

straitman

Moderator
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
16,829
Flights
My Map
Re, shoes: Lately its a good idea to just take them off and put them through the x-ray. Could save you a full body search. I heard a TSA guy actually thank a patron for doing this.
Like everywhere else, if you treat the security staff like people and not just idiots you'll do alright. I have one pair of shoes that always sets off the scanners. Obvious answer -- don't wear them or take them off prior to going through security.

Remember the security people are doing the maximum job for minimum pay and with minimum training and are expected to appease all types of people including those who have been travelling for quite a while and are tired and grumpy. Largely they do a GREAT job :idea:

Let's all be friendly and co operative for them. It will, and does make a difference :D
 

thadocta

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
757
I sort of agree and disagree - when I am wearing my Yakka! boots (steel capped) I always take them off before going through security, as I *know* it will set off the alarm. Things like this are sensible, it pre-empts what will happen.

I won't take off kmy joggers though unless told to, and it hasn't happened yet.

As far as the situation goes in the US, I would have to agree that the situation prior to 11/9 was an absolute joke - people were able to get things onto aircraft which they never would have been able to do in Australia, most Asian cities or in Europe. The result was what we saw on 11/9.

The reaction of the US though was to go extremely overboard.

All they had to do was to drag their security arrangements up to what the rest of the world as already doing, and the situation would have been sweet.

But they chose not to do this, they went overbopard and created a situation which causes the maximum amount of inconvenience for the minimum gain.

I can understand how they could be paranoid, but they really should have looked at "Worlds Best Practice" and merely copied it. The situation in the US at the moment is far short of it.

Dave
 

straitman

Moderator
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
16,829
Flights
My Map
I can understand how they could be paranoid, but they really should have looked at "Worlds Best Practice" and merely copied it. The situation in the US at the moment is far short of it.
As was demonstrated in the last week (or so) where someone managed to not only get on the wrong flight BUT the wrong flight AND the wrong airline. -- QANTAS instead of CATHAY I believe :!:
 

megaclay

Newbie
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
1
Entry into US

I really think it's small inconvenience to have to suffer if you consiuder whats at stake.

OK taking off your shoes is kind of a pain but I'd rather take the....say extra 40 seconds to do this than worry that I'm sitting there with a guy that has enough explosive in his shoe to kill everybody on the plane.

C'mon people I think there are bigger things to worry about than extra security at the airport. I personally think that Australia should be more like this....or should we wait until somebody flies a plane into a building first....
 

redrat

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
225
... and how are they going to get through the door? Even when that idiot tried to kill the FA's with the wooden stakes the door to the flightdeck was locked.
It looks like terrorists are using trucks these days instead of aircraft anyway.
Look, it's just a case of wearing the right gear.
ie. slip on shoes, etc. Those of us flying everyday are used to it.
 

straitman

Moderator
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
16,829
Flights
My Map
Those of us flying everyday are used to it.
That's right. If you know that your shoes are going to be a problem the choice is don't wear that particular pair OR accept that you'll have to take them off. I have one pair that I just don't bother to wear on board any more as it's just not worth the hastle to me.

:D
 

thadocta

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
757
Re: Entry into US

megaclay said:
I really think it's small inconvenience to have to suffer if you consiuder whats at stake.

OK taking off your shoes is kind of a pain but I'd rather take the....say extra 40 seconds to do this than worry that I'm sitting there with a guy that has enough explosive in his shoe to kill everybody on the plane.

C'mon people I think there are bigger things to worry about than extra security at the airport. I personally think that Australia should be more like this....or should we wait until somebody flies a plane into a building first....
The thing is that Australia, and most SE Asian ports, and most European ports, were all extremely secure before 11/9, and they managed this without inconveniencing passengers. We manage this even now, still without inconveniencing passengers.

The United States, on the other hand, has done its usual trick of going totally overboard. "Oh dear, we have a rat in the house, let's explode a thermonuclear device over the entire continent, that will surely kill that rat."

Most countries - Australia amongst them - have managed to get the security just right. The United States has gone overboard like it typically does. There are other areas where the US has gone overboard that I know of (totally unrelated to travel) where this is typified.

A pity the US can't look at "Worlds Best Practice" and decide to copy it. Of course, this would show the US system to be inadequate, and we can't have that, can we????

Dave
(Who fully expects to be the subject of TSA scrutiny the next time he is in the US)
 

arun

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
311
The following is from AA newsletter. I believe all Australian passports are machine readable and the new rules do not affect us. Am I correct?


New Documentation Rules For Travel To/Through U.S.



The following information will provide information regarding the suspension of the Transit Without Visa (TWOV) program, as well as new requirements for the Visa Waiver program.

Transit Without Visa (TWOV) Program Suspension
The Department of Homeland Security has suspended the Transit Without Visa (TWOV) program. The following new rules are effective August 2, 2003, as of 11:00 a.m. U.S. Eastern time. The Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will no longer permit visitors to transit the United States for travel to a foreign destination without a visa, unless another valid visa exception applies.

In order to accommodate passengers with immediate travel plans and passengers traveling on the return portion of their trip, CBP will permit passengers to transit the United States in the following cases:
Passengers with tickets purchased on or before July 24, 2003.
For TWOV passengers whose inbound flights are scheduled to depart prior to 12:01a.m U.S. Eastern time, Tuesday August 5, 2003, CBP will allow persons presented as TWOV to transit the United States on the initial portion of their trip provided that the passenger's ticket was purchased on or before July 24, 2003.

Returning TWOV Passengers
For TWOV passengers whose inbound flights are scheduled to depart prior to 11:01a.m U.S. Eastern time, August 9, 2003, CBP will allow passengers who previously transited the United States under the TWOV program who are traveling on the return portion of their roundtrip ticket to transit the United States.
If you are traveling on or after August 9, 2003, you may be given a full refund for any unused portion of your ticket back to the original form of payment or you may begin the process for application for a US visa. Currently, international-to-international passengers on American Airlines flights who are U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, participants in the Visa Waiver Program (see Visa Waiver Program below), Canadians and passengers in possession of valid visas that authorize transit through the United States, must clear Customs and Border Protection upon arrival in the United States.

Visa Waiver Program
American Airlines is advising passengers traveling to the United States that the U.S. State Department will require tighter passport controls that have been designed to increase security.

Effective Oct. 1, all citizens from 27 countries participating in a new visa waiver program must present a machine-readable passport upon arrival at their port of entry into the United States when entering under the visa waiver program. The machine-readable passports have coded data on the photo page, and all participating countries now are issuing the new type of passport.

Also effective with the new policy, passengers without machine-readable passports no longer will be able to take advantage of the visa waiver program. Nationals of a visa waiver-eligible country who do not yet have a machine-readable passport should either obtain one or apply for a visa from the U.S. Consulate in their country of residence or country of nationality prior to travel. In addition, all children, including babies, must have their own machine-readable passport and can no longer be included on one of their parents' passports for entry into the United States under the visa waiver program.

Countries participating in the visa waiver program include:

Andorra
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brunei
Denmark
Finland France
Germany
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Liechtenstein Luxembourg
Monaco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
San Marino Singapore
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
 

icemann

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
268
That would appear so.

Well, I've got two chances because I hold both a GB and Aus passport, and my fiancee is HK Chinese, so she's still got the GB passport too :)
 

Globalflyer

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2003
Messages
1
Entry into the USA

I do SYD/LAX about 5 times a year. I have an I- Pass card but the machines rarely work. :cry: Has anyone else experienced this :?:
 

QF WP

Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2002
Messages
15,718
Flights
My Map
globalflyer, haven't had your problem, but then again I only go to USA once a year. Off again 27 Dec, so will see whether my Passport works (as well as Mrs LW's)
 

drron

AFF Supporter
Joined
Jul 4, 2002
Messages
19,054
4 trips to usa in last 18 months-2 into lax,2 into jfk.Not 1 problem on arrival-usually in hire car in 1 hour.
Leaving is a different story.It just takes time.I now always take my shoes,belt & watch off.If you dont set the detector off it is definitely a lot easier.Setting it off at jfk 12 months ago lead to 3 searches before getting on plane.Domestically though have had absolutely no problems at orlando,chicago and philadelphia-here i checked in and was at the lounge in 10 minutes even though morning rush period.Domestically I have always had e-tickets booked through AA web-site.You put tickets on hold and arrange payments through AA office in sydney.Doing this from the sunshine coast has not been a problem-in fact they have often saved me money-definitely better than the service from QF.
Personally I think the US security screening is more for show than genuine security.I have witnessed X-ray screening of checked luggage where no one is watching the screen as bags go through.I am more worried at the possibility of something being smuggled on the plane eg by a baggage handler belonging to aterrorist organisation.That would never happen in australia would it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

AFF on Air Podcast

  • jb747’s Stellar Career with Qantas – AIR013
    Sat, 15 Jun 2019 03:00:41 AEST
      In this special edition of the podcast, Matt chats to John Bartels (a.k.a. jb747) about his flying career with Qantas, the A380, the QF30 incident, flight training, retirem ...
  • Cheap Virgin Australia Business Class – AIR012
    Sat, 01 Jun 2019 03:05:28 AEST
      Find out how to get cut-price Virgin Australia Business Class tickets by buying and redeeming Etihad Guest miles! This episode also includes some listener Q&A and an interv ...
  • Star Alliance Status – AIR011
    Sat, 18 May 2019 09:39:41 AEST
      Find out how to easily earn Star Alliance Gold status with several different frequent flyer programs! This episode also includes an interview with John Blom, Australia’s ...
  • Premium Economy – AIR010
    Sat, 04 May 2019 00:21:32 AEST
      Premium Economy is a great compromise if you want a more comfortable experience than Economy, without paying for Business or First class airfares! In this episode, AFF’s ...
  • Hyperinflation of Points – AIR009
    Sat, 20 Apr 2019 04:49:59 AEST
      Frequent flyer points are a valuable currency, but they aren’t immune from hyperinflation! In this episode, Matt discusses why frequent flyer points are a terrible long-t ...

Community Statistics

Threads
81,616
Messages
1,884,716
Members
49,498
Latest member
angusmackenzie
Top