Electronic Devices Dilema

Discussion in 'Open Discussion' started by flyer4703, Jul 24, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.
Joining AFF is fast, simple & ABSOLUTELY FREE -  join now by clicking on the JOIN NOW button, and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.
Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)
  1. flyer4703

    flyer4703 Member

    Nov 21, 2005
    129
    1
    Brisbane
    What do you do if the person next to you continues to use an electronic device during take off or landing?
    Do you sit silently and hope it doesn't interfere with aircraft systems, ask them would they mind turning it off or call a FA?
    Asking them to turn it off if isn't so bad if you are coming into land, but could be awkward on take off if you have to spend the next 90 minutes beside them.
    I had this situation this morning and chose to sit silently, however if it was you that was on the Bne - Syd flight today and you used your Blackberry for the whole flight I think it was selfish in the extreme to have put other passengers at risk regardless of the small possibility of it causing a problem.
    There is obviously some risk with the use of electronic devices or we wouldn't be given warnings.
    That's the end of my rant....I feel better now.
     

  2. Gazza

    Gazza Member

    Feb 5, 2006
    122
    1
    People will only act like pratts if others let them get away with it.

    Gazza
     
  3. clifford

    clifford Established Member

    Jul 6, 2004
    1,765
    243
    Canberra / London
    I must admit that I usually ask my seat neighbour to desist if whatever they are doing is clearly against the airline's stated safety rules. Not always appreciated (and invariably ignored) though.

    On a recent SQ flight from SIN to SYD, I mentioned to the male person sitting next to me (in seat 17K - an exit row - on a 747) that SQ rules required him to keep his shoes on during takeoff, and his response was quite negative. Just as well he wasn't required to help the crew in an emergency.

    So there you go...
     
  4. Mal

    Mal Enthusiast

    Dec 25, 2004
    12,228
    1,312
    London
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    I'm not really a confrontational type, unless really worked up over something, so I probably wouldn't do much except mentally wish them unwell things :D

    I have sat next to a workmate (friend) who chose to take photos using his camera from takeoff until we were well up in the air... I did mention it to him, but he shrugged it off as something that would never cause issues.
     
  5. meloz

    meloz Member

    Sep 25, 2005
    332
    56
    It is possible the device was being used in "flight mode" which is permitted.

    Meloz
     
  6. serfty

    Moderator

    Nov 16, 2004
    39,555
    7,970
    MEL
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Whether it's in "Flight Mode" or not is moot; it's supposed to be turned off for takeoff and landing!
     
  7. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    7
    1F
    Indeed it is!

    I have an i-mate JAMin which is a Pocket PC/Phone, and switch it to flight mode when requested (which is before boarding DJ flights and usually during taxying on QF flights).

    On my device, switching to flight mode turns off the radio (phone), the wireless LAN, the Bluetooth and the infra-red functions. There is nothing left to transmit or receive so it should not cause a problem when in flight mode, but I follow the rules nonetheless.
     
  8. kyle

    kyle Active Member

    Mar 8, 2006
    803
    89
    MEL
    Call the FA over and ask about a totally unrelated matter. Then hopefully the FA notices the elec device next door.
     
  9. flyer4703

    flyer4703 Member

    Nov 21, 2005
    129
    1
    Brisbane
    Great suggestion Kyle, I will remember that if it happens again.
     
  10. markis10

    markis10 Veteran Member

    Nov 25, 2004
    30,091
    5,548
    BNE & SYD
    All electronic devices have the potential to transmit RF even with their radio turned off, which is why all electronic devices such as IPOds etc should be off even though they dont contain radio receivers. Your sitting on 7km's of wiring, some of which are fly by wire controls although the most common interference appears to be to the VOR or "omni" radio navigation systems. Interesting read here: Electromagnetic interference with aircraft systems
     
  11. newflyer

    newflyer Intern

    Sep 19, 2005
    90
    17
    The 'Berra (ACT)
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Oops - so you're telling me it's a no-no to using a (compact) digital to take piccies at take-off and landing?

    As an ex-photographer, I take HEAPS of them - never been told off, but being a polite person, I would do so without question if asked (by FA or fellow passenger).

    Interestingly enough, I was thinking about this very same issue last week when I flew back from Syd.I was seated in the exit row next to a fella who, despite several requests from the FAs, continued sending texts from his mobile. He simply turned it off when asked, and after the Captain had asked cabin crew to be seated for take-off, he turned it back on again! As if that wasn't enough, he had his iPod blaring the whole time!

    (And no, given he was about four times as big as me and one grumpy looking dude, I didn't make any comment...).

    NF
     
  12. bigjobs

    bigjobs Active Member

    Jun 4, 2005
    754
    72
    what my goal is when i fly is my safety and getting off the flight safely. i am the one who loses if i am not safe.

    given that is my goal i would choose to act on keeping myself safe by asking the flight attendant to do address the person. i think that the FA's are the appropriate person to do this as they have legitimate authority and i don't.

    when asking the flight attendant i would be clear in stating exactly what i observed and also clear in stating that i might be missing some perfectly good evidence/reason as to why the person is using the device. i would also ask the FA to 'inquire' with the passenger rather than 'order' or 'tell' the passenger ...

    i would also let the passenger know that this is what i am choosing to do and that i am choosing this cause i am concerned for my safety and that i am responsible to myself for keeping myself safe. in keeping myself safe i will control what i can and addressing your choice to use your device when you may not be permitted too is one way i can increase my likelihood of staying safe.
     
  13. Mal

    Mal Enthusiast

    Dec 25, 2004
    12,228
    1,312
    London
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    My understanding is that digital cameras are not allowed to be used during takeoff etc.

    It may sound weird, but it is for good reasons. Some devices have been known to malfunction and cause interference even though they are not designed to cause interference.

    From the Qantas website (Flying with Us - In the Air - Communication)

    "Electronic Equipment

    All electronic devices, including PDAs, laptop computers, handheld games and toys must be switched off during take-off and landing.

    Portable electronic equipment such as laptop computers (including WiFi and Bluetooth enabled devices), PDAs (without mobile phones), personal music (for example, iPods) and electronic game devices may be used when the aircraft seat belt sign is extinguished after take-off and until the top of descent.
    "

    If you really want to check the Qantas view then I suggest emailing them through their feedback link. My understanding is that a digital camera is a form of electronic equipment and banned as part of their rules (just like Ipods for example, or PDA's even without radio transmitters).

    Markis10's post above discusses this as well.
     
  14. NM

    NM
    Moderator

    Aug 27, 2004
    15,768
    1,214
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    That is correct. AA's FAs will often state something like "if it has an off switch then it must be switched off at this time" and they will often say "and that include noise-cancelling headphones".
     
  15. Reggie

    Reggie Established Member

    Mar 20, 2006
    1,616
    182
    Manchester
    I have noted on another thread here where I was seated next to a pax who was blatently using his blackberry to send and recieve email in front of the FA whilst we taxied to the runway and she said nothing. We were in first class. In this case it would have been pointless to request him to stop or infrom the FA's
     
  16. Mal

    Mal Enthusiast

    Dec 25, 2004
    12,228
    1,312
    London
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    #16 Mal, Jul 29, 2006
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2006
    It's amazing what F class pax can get away with sometimes... There does seem to be some flexibility with the rules when in that cabin. (BTW, I think a person on a 747 using their mobile when in F is more likely to cause interferance as they're below/near the cockpit/sensitive electronic gear)
     
  17. browski

    browski Established Member

    Sep 8, 2004
    1,490
    416
    Melbourne
    If the pilots themselves use them on takeoff and landing, why would anyone find them unsafe. Would seem a strange uninformed request from a FA.
     
  18. Mal

    Mal Enthusiast

    Dec 25, 2004
    12,228
    1,312
    London
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    The problem isn't that noise cancelling headphones (or any other electronic device) is unsafe normally. Some devices actively cause intereferance by transmitting radio waves or electromagnetic fields. These are known about (eg phones etc). There is a second class of devices which although not designed to transmit interferance still can in extreme circumstances due to malfunction. This is why the blanket ban applies.

    Another issue is that FA's don't know every device on the planet and what it's capabilities are. Is a PDA just a PDA, or does it have Bluetooth/GSM capability? Are the headphones corded, or do they also have a detachable cord and can wirelessly receive sound? Is that toy just a toy that says "Hello" or is it the latest in the Furby type range of toys that "socialise" with other toys nearby.

    Headphones also pose another problem. If you are using your own music (such as IPOD) are you able to hear instructions from the cabin crew/pilot/etc?
     
  19. NM

    NM
    Moderator

    Aug 27, 2004
    15,768
    1,214
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Things used in the cockpit have been tested and certified for use there. Things carried on by passengers have not been through siuch testing. So it is a case of the airline making a "no exception" rule, and I personally believe that is the correct way to do it. Once they make an exception for one type of device, they are on a very slipery slope to making exceptions for all sorts of things. And that leads to confusion and misunderstanding as to what is allowed and what is not allowed.

    I fully support the ruling that no electronic devices should be operated by passengers during takeoff and landing - no exceptions. And yes, I am very confident that noise cancelling headphones will not cause any interference. But the line has to be drawn somewhere and its much easier to understand and enforce when the line is one extreme end of teh spectrum.
     
  20. Yada Yada

    Yada Yada Established Member

    Dec 6, 2004
    1,872
    7
    1F
    Was this on QF? You are allowed to use your mobile phone during taxying.
     
Loading...

Share This Page