JohnK
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Posts
- 44,246
What do you suggest they do? Let everyone run riot as much as they want?
Accept the government elected and stop rioting.
What do you suggest they do? Let everyone run riot as much as they want?
Agreed, while I am sure the army's motives are not pure someone needs to take some control here as the situation was getting progressively nastier.What do you suggest they do? Let everyone run riot as much as they want?
And who would you like to enforce that given the police are clearly unable to?Accept the government elected and stop rioting.
This declaration causes you to relook at the wording of your travel insurance policy
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
And who would you like to enforce that given the police are clearly unable to?
OK, so the police are unwilling rather than unable, it still rather leaves my question open. If the police and unable/unwilling to enforce then who are you suggesting should do so?The police could enforce the situation except that they tend to be on a different side to the Army.Lots of reports of off duty policemen being involved in the previous Red Shirt problems.Army hierarchy in the past were loyal to the Yellow shirts-probably not as solid now though.
However the reason it is all a problem now is that the King's health is not good.The Crown Prince is a divisive figure but ordinary Thais will still be swayed by their king.As well the Bangkok elite will have to be wary as there is still the lese majestere laws outlawing criticism of the King.
Thailand Protests And Instability - Business Insider
The Crown Prince has recently been appointed to the Defence Council and put in charge of the Royal Guard meaning he is definitely the favourite in the succession stakes.The problem for the establishment is that he is seen to be very friendly to mr Thaksin.I read this article in the economist on my flight to DFW which describes the situation-
The future of Thailand's elite: Helplessly hoping | The Economist
OK, so the police are unwilling rather than unable, it still rather leaves my question open. If the police and unable/unwilling to enforce then who are you suggesting should do so?
PS, that's really a questin for JohnK but happy for others to express their opinion on it too.
As long as the airport stays open I'm not too concerned.
Even then I have plan B.
Accept the government elected and stop rioting.
I'm certainly not in the camp of thinking its simple, I agree with Aussie_Flyer that is very complex and can probably do without the simplistic non-solutions being proposed by some.Seems simple to us westerners but a lot more convoluted for the Thais.
...sorry to be pedantic....2008 actually; a 5-10000 person conference in Bangkok I was attending got cancelled 3 days before I was due to fly into BKK.As others have said. .. as long as you remain clear of the protest sites foreigners will be and have been mostly unaffected. Except of course during the airport shut down of 2007 which considering the economical impact on the country I think would be unlikely to reoccur.
...sorry to be pedantic....2008 actually; a 5-10000 person conference in Bangkok I was attending got cancelled 3 days before I was due to fly into BKK.
...sorry to be pedantic....2008 actually; a 5-10000 person conference in Bangkok I was attending got cancelled 3 days before I was due to fly into BKK.
Good to have a plan B ,but it should ionvolve access to an international airport in Thailand. I'd favour HKT over others.As long as the airport stays open I'm not too concerned.
Even then I have plan B.
Indeed.
We're with TID and their policy reads....
We will not pay for any of the following:
5. A loss that arises from any act of war (whether war is declared or not) or from any rebellion, revolution, insurrection or taking of power by the military.