AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
completely agree, it is not the data's fault, this article tried to use the data for something it was never intended for. The data itself is fine if used in the correct context, and as you rightly point out it shows the increased traffic on the route, but that is all it shows.t’s not the data’s fault people are using it incorrectly! Don’t blame the data.
It proves that the airline routes between Australia and the US are growing, and that’s the important point in the context of a frequent flyer forum.
Except that it doesn't. It does not show how many of those "US" pax are not going to the US, but instead connecting to other international flights. eg. Someone going to Mexico via LAX isn't going to the US, yet that data will say they are.It’s not the data’s fault people are using it incorrectly! Don’t blame the data.
It proves that the airline routes between Australia and the US are growing, and that’s the important point in the context of a frequent flyer forum.
It’s not the data’s fault people are using it incorrectly! Don’t blame the data.
It proves that the airline routes between Australia and the US are growing, and that’s the important point in the context of a frequent flyer forum.
Except that it doesn't. It does not show how many of those "US" pax are not going to the US, but instead connecting to other international flights. eg. Someone going to Mexico via LAX isn't going to the US, yet that data will say they are.
Who's blaming the data?
It might well be good data in the context of a frequent flyer forum, but I think in the context of a thread that has the title "Have Australians Stopped Flying to the USA?", it really isn't helpful at all, and therefore rather meaningless.
Probably!!Do you have to declare your AFF account details?!
No, you don’t.Probably!!
Probably!!
They wouldn’t even know what it is.Not yet![]()
Unless they search LOTFAP ...They wouldn’t even know what it is.
Dust off a MySpace account and move on.
Well you’re the first to use that for ages!Unless they search LOTFAP ...![]()
ROTFLMAO - if they do then we are all doomed!!Unless they search LOTFAP ...![]()
Lurking in the proposed changes is the closure of the ESTA website and then only the app can be used to apply for an ESTA. ie an app you must install on your phone…even China doesn’t require that, yet.The Guardian the other day had more solid information on Australian travel to the USA ans is reporting a maasive reduction.
And that's before this week's announcement that you may have to open up five years of your social media accounts to the immigration authorities.
The numbers are in this article. ‘The whole thing disgusts me’: Australians ditch US travel as new rules require social media to be declared
Are we still allowed to make fun of Walmart shoppers?Unless they search LOTFAP ...![]()
I suspect that having an ESTA wouldn't make much difference for me - I've poked far too much fun at DJT on Facebook - if I did plan a U.S. trip I might as well book a return flight for the same day as arrival.Lurking in the proposed changes is the closure of the ESTA website and then only the app can be used to apply for an ESTA. ie an app you must install on your phone…even China doesn’t require that, yet.
My advice would be apply for an ESTA within 60 days of that proposal being issued if you don’t have one already. Mine has at least 18 mths to run….
Are we still allowed to make fun of Walmart shoppers?
Makes a huge difference if you’ve not already declared your FaceSpaces and other socials.I suspect that having an ESTA wouldn't make much difference for me - I've poked far too much fun at DJT on Facebook - if I did plan a U.S. trip I might as well book a return flight for the same day as arrival.
