Are ATR's really that much slower?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sequel

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Posts
482
Just about to book a trip BNE-EMD. Both QF and DJ depart BNE at 05:45, however QF, with the Dash 8-400 get into EMD 30 mins earlier than DJ with the ATR 72-500. (1:25 vs. 1:55). On the return, the ATR picks up 10 mins, but is still 20 mins slower than the Dash 8.

Is the ATR really 30% slower than the D8?
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Wow, so they are 30% slower. When looking at day returns, that is a whole hour you loose!

I guess that is why DJ are $500 and QF $700 (only full flexi's available for both).
 
You need to remember that on these short hops, most time is spent in the climb, not in cruise, which I think was the argument for DJ opting for the slower planes over their smaller ERJs
 
VA may also have padded thier schedule somewhat introducing a new a/c type and new destination so in practive the difference may be less than the full 30 mins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top