BAM1748, it is not compulsory to read every post, as one moderator said.
You don't like them; others do, as evidenced by more than 500 'likes' for the QF delays/cancellations thread and many other likes for the threads re other airlines.
Note my explanation elsewhere. Not every traveller or AFF viewer has your vast knowledge of the world of aviation. Some may value threads that at least give them an inkling as to which airlines, on balance, treat passengers well during or immediately after disruptions and which ones do not, which is why information from passengers 'caught' by such events can be like gold. Similarly the punctuality of all airlines is not identical.
Believe it or not, many passengers do not know which airline between say MEL and SYD is the most subject to delays. In recent months that has been JQ, although the perception of many who do not often travel (heightened by a previous television show) may still be that TT is by far the worst.
Even though every day is different, a pattern has emerged of frequent poor punctuality from that airline on this busy route. Many new viewers of AFF may be looking to increase their knowledge of which carrier on which route delivers the best value. While timekeeping is only one part of 'value' (with the most important consideration, safety, a 'given' to many travellers) passengers are often in a hurry to get to their destination and may not want to patronise an airline that may be the worst on a route for delays, cancellations or both.
Why not concentrate on the areas of this website that you enjoy reading and skip those that you find irrelevant or boring?
You said above that you 'rarely look at them' (these posts.) That is not consistent with commenting in a critical tone!
