There's been speculation about flaps not being correctly configured. If that was the case, wouldn't the aircraft have not climbed initially?
Since the introduction of electronic calculation of the take of data, the ability to work out the 'best' configuration changed dramatically. On the 747, we basically used just the one setting, because it was too time consuming to calculate the data for multiple settings. Laptops and iPads changed that, so that now you can see an entire range of settings being used, and it's common to see takeoffs with very little flap. If you don't have the correct setting, the aircraft will not rotate and lift off normally, and the video seems to show a normal rotation.As far as I'm concerned, I can see no reason to continue with the flap theories.
Commenters (commentators?) are speculating that it's dust from the end of the runway, the run-off area.
Someone triangulated the liftoff, a building, and security cam, and they come up with lift off near taxiway C, which would mean about 3,000' remaining. That's pretty much what I'd expect for a normal take-off.
Mover over on YT suggests minimal or no flats set (he flys the 787).
Mover should know better than that. Firstly the video does show slats, and a small amount of flap, but if you tried to take off without flap you'd get a very hard to ignore configuration warning. You would also get that warning if the flap selected were not one of the notional 'take-off' settings. There is also a comparison of selected flap position against the FMC data when the electronic checklist is being done.
But others have said that crash wreckage shows extended slats and flaps not retracted. I wonder - would the mechanical damage from the impact have dislodged them?
Unlikely.
He also commented on the gear still being down.
There's conjecture about the status of the RAT, which probably has more to tell us.
And some "expert" on 3AW talks about auto-throttle problem and other reasons.
You can just push through the autothrottle. Anyway, on a Boeing, it's disabled from 60 knots to about 400 AGL. I'm probably more interested in what the FCUs and their software were doing. This all looks so normal, right up to the point where the air ground switch would have changed to air.