Air India B787 crash Ahmedabad

So the FDR might have been getting different information to the FADEC then.

The fuel cut off switches directly operate a relay which operates the valve which control fuel flow to the engine called a Spar valve without ever going via FADEC.

While FADEC can control the Spar valve (I think) , the important point to note is that the prelim report data came from the EAFR (787 combined FDR+CVR) which indicated the Fuel cut off switches were operated. Operation of The fuel cut of switches is directly recorded by EAFR and does not involve FADEC so any "FADEC glitch" could not have caused the recording of fuel cut off switch condition to OFF by the EAFR.
 
Last edited:
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

The fuel cut off switches directly operate a relay which operates the valve which control fuel flow to the engine called a Spar valve without ever going via FADEC.

While FADEC can control the Spar valve (I think) , the important point to note is that the prelim report data came from the EAFR (787 combined FDR+CVR) which indicated the Fuel cut off switches were operated. Operation of The fuel cut of switches is directly recorded by EAFR and does not involve FADEC so any "FADEC glitch" could not have caused the recording of fuel cut off switch condition to OFF by the EAFR.
So a human hand switched them to "OFF" in the coughpit?
 
Have people seen this and have any comment?:


I know it's derived from the Geoffrey Thomas site. Nevertheless, it seems to be an extremely precise analysis so could such an alignment of highly unlikely events be a plausible explanation?
 
Had a vague recollection ? the taxiing activity was longer than normal due to a closed taxiway so there was a whole run sprint of much extra distance IMG_8985.png
From further vague recollection the weather had been rainy (water ingress was mentioned as well)

With situations of risk
Often there is a
Low likelihood AND High impact

just because the likelihood is Low doesn’t mean it can’t or won’t happen and when it does - well we saw the impact
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top