harvyk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Posts
- 7,009
- Qantas
- Gold
34 posts over 4 pages and nobody is willing to give the OP a chance.
Anyone ?
(Don't know if you are being sarcastic or not, so for the purpose of this answer I will assume not, that's the problem with the internet, sarcasm doesn't translate very well)
I don't think we're not giving the OP a chance, and obviously if the OP feels so inclined to spend 34 hours at an airport then that's their prerogative, it's just I myself have spent a couple of nights at airports, all of them involved a very late arrival (think an early am arrival) and a breakfast time departure (think sometime before 9am). At sometime around the 4am mark, after you have gotten exactly zero meaningful sleep (you never sleep well when you need to keep one eye on your belongs to make sure no one takes anything out, or worse, puts something in), you will be questioning why you are doing this, and unlike seriously long haul flights where there is almost a badge of honor for doing so, there is very little street cred to come from simply killing time at an airport. For me, typically anything longer than a 5 or 6 hour layover is reason to leave the airport and explore.
Now the OP has said that they are trying to save money. The way I see it is that if you are in a city that is virtually on the other side of the world to where you live, why not jump at the opportunity to get out and see the sights? By failing to do so is IMHO a much bigger waste of money than blowing a few hundred dollars on a day of entertainment / accom.