2026 F1 Thread

You literally cut the IF off my sentence and changed the meaning.

Yes the penalty was for cutting corners not an unsafe car, he couldnt turn one way he said...therefore maybe proving car was possibly unsafe??? Point is he lost a few spots, gained no advantage and didnt really interfere with others too much...a needless penalty.

May as well give one to HAD for damaging the wall.
I think Ferrari/LEC may have painted themselves into a corner and were effectively wedged by the stewards. LEC claims he can't turn in a direction due to vehicle damage, so he needed to cut this chicanes. Stewards argue that there was no clear and obvious damage preventing him from turning, therefore his chicane cutting was excessive and constitutes gaining an advantage, issuing a 20s penalty. If Ferrari/LEC want to argue the point re: damage, then they risk proving the car was unsafe and should have been parked up. The potential penalty for not doing so? Likely more severe.

Game. Set. Match. Stewards.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top