markis10
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 33,358
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
Thanks medhead and anat01 for your discussion, which I have foillowed with interest. Thanks, too, to TonyHancock for his humour, which I appreciated.
Meggsy, you say, "I'm not sure about the USA but would be gobsmacked if the FAA did not have a similar program." Well, certainly, I too would be gobsmacked, and gobsmacked indeed I was when a Delta captain suggested to me that the US testing program was not comprehensive. And his advice would seem to explain to me why one still sees a 175kg pilot in the coughpit and an 87 year old flight attendant in the cabin. Despite what any of you say about prejudices, I would still maintain that there is a good prima facie case that such individuals are NOT fit for duty, and that if they wish to continue they should be required to demonstrate that they are indeed fit by passing a comprehensive test, designed with their particular possible weaknesses in mind and executed thoroughly and impartially.
Have any other AFF members come across crew members in USA or elsewhere who caused you to wonder about their fitness for duty, for whatever reason?
Roughly speaking the FAA and CASA follow the same rules, in the case of an airline pilot in the US:
Index of FAA Second Class Pilot Medical Standards

