Varying seat pitch in JQ port vs starboard

Status
Not open for further replies.

crm911

Intern
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Posts
70
I fly JQ612 (AVV-SYD) every Monday, so I have been in a few aircraft in different rows. I didn't note the tail number, but last week I noticed that I had a decent amount of clearance in front of my knees, while the other (starboard) side had shorter people almost kneeing the seat in front of them. FWIW, I was in 24C and noted 24D and 25D as having shorter pitch. I am 172 cm.

The person in 24D didn't have much more space before the person in front reclined, when I took the photo. I couldn't take a photo of the person in 25D, which was next to me, or else I'd be in an even more cramped cell by now. :)

Since 25D was next to 24C, the entire starboard side must have been compressed.

Why would this happen?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2412[1].jpg
    IMG_2412[1].jpg
    95.6 KB · Views: 154
  • IMG_2413.jpg
    IMG_2413.jpg
    95.1 KB · Views: 153
Can't tell if that's really true or not, but I'm sure they'll do everything they can to fit in a few more seats. Speaking of which, the local bus I take to work here in SIN has the same thing - port seats have more leg room. Certainly not a problem for a 20min ride though.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Can't tell if that's really true or not, but I'm sure they'll do everything they can to fit in a few more seats. Speaking of which, the local bus I take to work here in SIN has the same thing - port seats have more leg room. Certainly not a problem for a 20min ride though.

SBS Transit or SMRT bus? Double decker or bendy bus? I was just in SIN recently and must admit I didn't even notice, but then again I have short legs. I'll have to check it out next time I'm in town...
 
I didn't note the tail number, but last week I noticed that I had a decent amount of clearance in front of my knees, while the other (starboard) side had shorter people almost kneeing the seat in front of them. FWIW, I was in 24C and noted 24D and 25D as having shorter pitch. I am 172 cm.

According to thejetstarsource.com, VH-VQN operated JQ612 on 29 April... I was thinking it could have been an old/new aircraft but it doesn't seem to be such a trend.
 
SBS Transit or SMRT bus? Double decker or bendy bus? I was just in SIN recently and must admit I didn't even notice, but then again I have short legs. I'll have to check it out next time I'm in town...

One of the very small private bus operators, actually. These guys operate a few routes into/out-of the business park where my office is.
 
I can't recall where I sat on 15 April in JQ612 but it was a C towards the rear, but I had hardly any room in front of my knees. thejetstarsource.com isn't working right now (wasn't aware of it before, thanks).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2319.jpg
    IMG_2319.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 96
Why would this happen?
IME on the aircraft with this configuration, you will notice onboard that - while the aircraft has 30 rows of seats on both sides, it only has a toilet on the starboard side prior to the rear exit. All that space that the a toilet would have taken up on the port side, gets shared out between the back rows in the form of leg room.
 
Hi, I confirmed this over 12 months ago on either an E170 (when they were operating them) or an E190, and I cant even remember which side I was seated on , but I do distinctly remember noticing an apparent difference and as the loadings were light, I used the cord from by headset to measure the seat pitch and there was from memory about a 6cm difference, but alas we now have to ride in the ATR from TSV to ROK, plus they have changed the schedule from the end of the day to mid day which is a lot less convenient. (however there is no other choice for a DIRECT flight ROK to TSV or return.)
 
IME on the aircraft with this configuration, you will notice onboard that - while the aircraft has 30 rows of seats on both sides, it only has a toilet on the starboard side prior to the rear exit. All that space that the a toilet would have taken up on the port side, gets shared out between the back rows in the form of leg room.

Doesn't the left side also have nothing in front of row 1 and sit slightly further forward than the right, which has a partition in front of it? All things being equal, the space has to disappear somewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top