Airport security: Intent to deceive?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flashback

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Posts
13,249
Airport security: Intent to deceive? : Nature News

Can the science of deception detection help to catch terrorists? Sharon Weinberger takes a close look at the evidence for it.
Sharon Weinberger
1decept.jpg



In August 2009, Nicholas George, a 22-year-old student at Pomona College in Claremont, California, was going through a checkpoint at Philadelphia International Airport when he was pulled aside for questioning. As the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees searched his hand luggage, they chatted with him about innocuous subjects, such as whether he'd watched a recent game.
Inside George's bag, however, the screeners found flash cards with Arabic words — he was studying Arabic at Pomona — and a book they considered to be critical of US foreign policy. That led to more questioning, this time by a TSA supervisor, about George's views on the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001. Eventually, and seemingly without cause, he was handcuffed by Philadelphia police, detained for four hours, and questioned by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents before being released without charge.
George had been singled out by behaviour-detection officers: TSA screeners trained to pick out suspicious or anomalous behaviour in passengers. There are about 3,000 of these officers working at some 161 airports across the United States, all part of a four-year-old programme called Screening Passengers by Observation Technique (SPOT), which is designed to identify people who could pose a threat to airline passengers.
 
Eventually, and seemingly without cause, he was handcuffed by Philadelphia police, detained for four hours, and questioned by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents before being released without charge.

I’m glad I don’t know nor have an intention of learning arabic. That’s probably an easy thing to look out for though, as stereotypical and bad as that seems.
 
There was a recent report on this program by the US DOT.Basically gave TSA a fail.Unfortunately can no lomger find it.
 
Inside George's bag, however, the screeners found flash cards with Arabic words — he was studying Arabic at Pomona —
Love the reporting. They thought he was innocent however...... :shock:

Look out, someone learning a language has flash cards in that language. :rolleyes:

Smacks of McCarthyism all over again. :(
Bet this guy is going to rethink his plans to sign up with the US military as a translator. (NB I just made that up to illustrate what is wrong with this reaction to someone learning arabic)
 
Hollywood has grabbed hold of this idea too.

The TV show Lie to Me in the pilot episode has a scene involving this.

While at an airport, Dr. Lightman carries a briefcase and acts suspiciously anxious. A TSA agent asks him to step out of line, and Dr. Lightman proceeds to act surprised and frustrated. He moves to check his briefcase rather than be searched triggering the TSA agent to force him to open his briefcase revealing a suspicious amount of cash. Dr. Lightman then informs the agent, Ria Torres, that they wish to hire her for the group because she has "natural" skills at interpreting microexpressions.
 
Probably won't be allowed to join if he was gay :shock:

Example:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/08/opinion/08benjamin.html

I was going to say similar, but nothing in the article suggested that he was gay. It’s a good way of getting out of service though… for the time being.

Hollywood has grabbed hold of this idea too.

The TV show Lie to Me in the pilot episode has a scene involving this.

I recall the episode, was very good. :)
 
v8Statesman said:
Hollywood has grabbed hold of this idea too.

The TV show Lie to Me in the pilot episode has a scene involving this.
That show is the only proof required to demonstrate that this is a totally stupid idea. The show is pathetic. But good if you need to stop thinking for a time

Notwithstanding the example quoted I thought the us military operated on "don't ask, don't tell" when it comes to sexual preferences
 
That show is the only proof required to demonstrate that this is a totally stupid idea. The show is pathetic. But good if you need to stop thinking for a time


I don't mind it, but some of the scenarios they seem to get lie detectors in for seem a little far fetched.

I personally believed Nicholas George learnt a very valuable lesson, don't carry anything which the average TSA officer doesn't understand, and \ or could (deliberately) misinterpret.
 
harvyk said:
I don't mind it, but some of the scenarios they seem to get lie detectors in for seem a little far fetched.

Sure it's entertaining I guess. My issue is the only episode I saw went something like:
To collegue "you can tell when someone is lying because their eyes look up and away from you"
Interview in next scene:
"did you kill them"
(eyes look up and away) "no"

Next scene to collegue
"you can tel they're lying when they fidget"
Interview
"did you kill them"
(fidgeting) "no"

Etc.

Sorry, but in what I saw the spoon feeding, brain dead bits far out weighed any entertainment value.
 
Regardless of how well the TSA are currently carrying out SPOT I think it remains an interesting area. It should not be discounted and discarded because it has not been subjected to controlled testing. Of course there is much room for improvement as the article points out.

I would be interested to find out if airport security in Australia uses these same techniques as I am frequently subjected to explosives tests and mini pat downs. After reading an article on Flyer Talk I assumed this had more to do with me looking easy an compliant than it did with my microexpressions and body language :p
 
blueflamenco said:
I would be interested to find out if airport security in Australia uses these same techniques as I am frequently subjected to explosives tests and mini pat downs. After reading an article on Flyer Talk I assumed this had more to do with me looking easy an compliant than it did with my microexpressions and body language :p
I've decided that being picked for explosives testing is mainly about the dude having to make a quota. The few times I've been tested recently the guy has been mainly interested in ticking off the count. I also gather that they must get hassled a fair bit because I've heard about how the testing gives me a nice place to put my stuff away. Positive spin over a trivality = being hassled IMO.

But then sometimes when I've tried to be quick and efficient at get my stuff off the belt and getting out of there, I've noticed the explosive guy hold off asking me. Maybe a psych out if they assume I'll get mad at being checked. Or maybe the guy remembers me as I go through the security check at about the same time every Monday morning
 
I've decided that being picked for explosives testing is mainly about the dude having to make a quota. The few times I've been tested recently the guy has been mainly interested in ticking off the count. I also gather that they must get hassled a fair bit because I've heard about how the testing gives me a nice place to put my stuff away. Positive spin over a trivality = being hassled IMO.

But then sometimes when I've tried to be quick and efficient at get my stuff off the belt and getting out of there, I've noticed the explosive guy hold off asking me. Maybe a psych out if they assume I'll get mad at being checked. Or maybe the guy remembers me as I go through the security check at about the same time every Monday morning

I think this is it, they choose people who won't get mad which makes their job a little easier.

I have my stuff back in no time and I'm still pulled aside.

Maybe I should try looking really cranky and argumentative so they don't choose me?! Ah.. It's not so bad. I am curious as to what they are really looking for though. I understand the swab business but does anyone really hide explosives in their bra? That seems a little too adventurous.
 
blueflamenco said:
I am curious as to what they are really looking for though. I understand the swab business but does anyone really hide explosives in their bra? That seems a little too adventurous.
As I understand they are looking for anything that you may have touched without too much thought and hence might not have washed clean. So shoe laces, mobile phones, zips, shoulders and arms, etc. Maybe a bra fits into that, or maybe the dude thought you were good looking ;)

I have heard about a demo of one of the testing machines during a training course and they are really sensitive. They had someone who had been handling explosives in the morning before the demo, so had cleaned up and washed properly and all that, shake someones hand. That someone then touch a third person on the shoulder. The machine detected explosives from the shoulder. Of course, being that sensitive they shouldn't need to test a bra.

If the cranky method gets you a special wait and interview don't blame me. ;) :lol
 
They swab your bra, that seems a little too forward?

On domestic flights for the explosives test I have never been touched but leaving Australia I have also had a mini pat down (not sure how else to describe it...) and the lady checks the middle of your chest.. I have no idea why.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

As I understand they are looking for anything that you may have touched without too much thought and hence might not have washed clean. So shoe laces, mobile phones, zips, shoulders and arms, etc. Maybe a bra fits into that, or maybe the dude thought you were good looking ;)

I have heard about a demo of one of the testing machines during a training course and they are really sensitive. They had someone who had been handling explosives in the morning before the demo, so had cleaned up and washed properly and all that, shake someones hand. That someone then touch a third person on the shoulder. The machine detected explosives from the shoulder. Of course, being that sensitive they shouldn't need to test a bra.

If the cranky method gets you a special wait and interview don't blame me. ;) :lol

Hehe I was thinking more like just putting on a cranky face after getting my things so they wouldn't even want to select me.

Oh and the bra question relates to the pat down I had after that but with the explosives lady.. So I thought they were related but I'm not sure what she was looking for. I don't think swabbing bra's would go down well with a lot of travelers! :lol:
 
Hehe I was thinking more like just putting on a cranky face after getting my things so they wouldn't even want to select me.

Oh and the bra question relates to the pat down I had after that but with the explosives lady.. So I thought they were related but I'm not sure what she was looking for. I don't think swabbing bra's would go down well with a lot of travelers! :lol:

I don't think it would go down well with *any* travelers, unless of course they're exhibitionists...
 
I don't think it would go down well with *any* travelers, unless of course they're exhibitionists...

Quite right. Although I doubt even exhibitionists would favor it since they are not in control of the situation and cannot elicit the shock they so desire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top