offshore171
Established Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Posts
- 2,053
finalisation, will there be a gradual brain drain in the meantime?
A real chance of a huge loss of institutional knowledge
finalisation, will there be a gradual brain drain in the meantime?
Maybe these global companies perhaps have the experience required to use these global IT systems? Just maybe? Built for Australian conditions may not be so relevant to an airline...This will just be “brilliant” for Qantas customers- NOT.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Telstra have too. Multiple other failures and cost blowouts here and overseas. None of that seems to matter with the present-day "box-ticking" exercise that procurement seems largely to be.What is pretty funny is that they chose Accenture, which, as other commenters have noted, has bungled pretty much every other project it has run.
That would be funny if it weren't so plausible.View attachment 531502
FINAL FLIGHT: Hundreds of Qantas employees facing redundancy have been offered a farewell gift from the airline: a complimentary one-way flight to India to train their replacements
The airline says the initiative is part of its commitment to supporting Australian workers through the transition.
“We want to make sure our 850 staff members feel valued right up until the moment we don’t need them,” said a Qantas spokesperson.
Employees will travel economy, with checked baggage, meals and seat selection available for an additional fee.
Qantas says return flights will be available at standard commercial rates, subject to availability.
![]()
Qantas offers 850 Australian workers free one-way flights to India to train their replacements
FINAL FLIGHT: Hundreds of Qantas employees facing redundancy have been offered a farewell gift from the airline: a complimentary one-way flight to India to train their replacements The airline says the initiative is part of its commitment to supporting Australian workers through the transition...doublebaytoday.com
I think the subsidiary model is much the same. Network A320 pilots earn half what a Qantas A321 Pilot makes. I understand those Qantas A330 Freighter pilots also earn loose change compared to the mothership.Eventually they will outsource the pilots and cabin crew
I think the subsidiary model is much the same. Network A320 pilots earn half what a Qantas A321 Pilot makes. I understand those Qantas A330 Freighter pilots also earn loose change compared to the mothership.
If they could outsource pilots you bet they would.
Well companies exist to make money and a profit.And the ATO
Jetstar already have outsourced almost half their cabin crew to companies in Thailand and Indonesia.Eventually they will outsource the pilots and cabin crew
The first thing I thought was "those Indian jobs will also be outsourced soon ... to AI!"There's a good article in the AFR about the strategy. It's a two step process whereby Qantas gets the immediate benefit of outsourced/lower cost jobs while Accenture works on a longer term project of replacing those jobs entirely with AI, and they'll share the profits of those cost savings.
What is pretty funny is that they chose Accenture, which, as other commenters have noted, has bungled pretty much every other project it has run.
I would have thought shareholders are the most dangerous and ravenous.Well companies exist to make money and a profit.
Lets not fool ourselves, its not about the customer or that matter the shareholder.Its about the executives.
I would have thought shareholders are the most dangerous and ravenous.
Shareholders only want profit. They certainly don't care about this outsourcing move, unless it is going to hit the share price in a permanently unfavourable way. Hell, shareholders will accept if a company killed people, so long as their profits stay intact and grow.
Profit by any means necessary: the war cry of the public shareholder.

And AECAnd the ATO
I agree, that WFH isn't a factor. In 2010-2011 and 2013-2014 I worked for a large US IT company in Australia. The first time we had most of our back office roles in Australia and everything worked as it should. When I came back the second time the majority of the back office roles were in India, but the contracts were set up poorly and the level of service was abysmal, which spilled over onto our clients. For example, all invoices should have been sent to the Project Manager for signoff, but the finance teams started sending them direct, and they were wrong. One way to cheese off a client is to send a wrong invoice. Another twist, was the finance team would get a bonus of 20% of any expense claim they could knock back - so they were incentivised not to approved valid expense claims. I hope that the Qantas contracts and agreements are setup to maintain level of service - but I'm not hopeful. How long before that spills over to us poor customers?In various companies I worked for accounts payable, IT support, marketing support, recruitment were all partially or fully either offshored (in-house) or outsourced (offshore) long before WFH became a thing.
It’s more that the types of jobs people can do effectively remotely can be done remotely - whether people are doing them sitting in an office everyday or from their home office.
I agree. The roles they are shedding are the one that will not be in plentiful supply in the marketplace. Plus the age of the people being let go is a major factor. If you're over 55 in the current workplace you're too old and have little chance of getting a job with a similar level and pay. Just look what happened to the baggage handlers who were illegally fired by Qantas under Alan Joyce's watch.As well as feeling sorry for the affected employees, I can foresee a period of chaotic change coming up, including for customers, if it's not done right. And Qantas doesn't have a good track record in this regard.
"It's all about the money, stupid".
