Qantas Project Sunrise & A350-1000ULR Discussion

[Human]

Also begs the question what airlines actually have a “wide” F seat/bed?

The widest beds I’ve slept on in the air were on JAL A350 F and Singapore Airlines 777 F. Both felt like actual beds and gave me more than enough space.

JAL:


SQ:

 

[Rayesfeg]

The pictures make my ironing board look wider, but yes, will have to wait on the actual dimensions. Perhaps it’s the pillows; I’m thinking about the current J pillow size when looking at this, but they might be more like a euro pillow.

I would say that the photos would have been taken in some sort of wide-angle to show as much of the mockup cabin as possible.
With that, the bed should look wider than it actually is in real life. So I do think there is probably some credit to the observation that the bed is going to be narrow.

 

[dajop]

Here’s the thing, the selling point for SYD-LHR is not a luxurious suite, but instead missing out on the stopover enroute at SIN or DXB (BA, SQ, EK being the only? competitors) and are there any F competitors to JFK that don’t take the long way around ?

The cabin isn’t being made for the bloggers or vloggers, and I’m sure QF know what they’re doing.

 

[fletty]

As long as the quality mattress topper they have in F currently is carried over..

 

[Rayesfeg]

Here’s the thing, the selling point for SYD-LHR is not a luxurious suite, but instead missing out on the stopover enroute at SIN or DXB (BA, SQ, EK being the only? competitors) and are there any F competitors to JFK that don’t take the long way around ?

The cabin isn’t being made for the bloggers or vloggers, and I’m sure QF know what they’re doing.

I would disagree with that. From the Qantas website, they compare the first-class suite as "boutique accommodation" which delivers "the ultimate in luxury"

 

[dajop]

I would disagree with that. From the Qantas website, they compare the first-class suite as "boutique accommodation" which delivers "the ultimate in luxury"

Qantas spinning something to be more than it actually is? Unheard of

 

[DC3]

Qantas spinning something to be more than it actually is? Unheard of

Yeah. Still waiting for a report from someone who has actually seen the mock-up, although the conjecture is rather amusing.

 

[dairyfloss]

The pictures make my ironing board look wider, but yes, will have to wait on the actual dimensions. Perhaps it’s the pillows; I’m thinking about the current J pillow size when looking at this, but they might be more like a euro pillow.

In this design image, the bed looks slightly wider than the adjacent 55cm (22in) wide reclining armchair. They reference 2m (80in) for the bed length, but no width for the bed is given. It looks like the bed might be 10 cm or so wider than the seat, putting it at about 65cm wide, or approximately 4cm narrower than a standard infant cot mattress, thus giving it further clout as a true First class of bed



Cheers,
Matt.

 

[moa999]

While never shown I do wonder whether the seat slides down to make a larger area, albeit your mostly want to stay on the main mattress

 

[RooFlyer]

Here’s the thing, the selling point for SYD-LHR is not a luxurious suite, but instead missing out on the stopover enroute at SIN or DXB (BA, SQ, EK being the only? competitors)

Sure, but at about 19 hours, presumably sleep is part of the deal?

The cabin isn’t being made for the bloggers or vloggers, and I’m sure QF know what they’re doing.

Making money.

When we do see someone actually in the bed, you can bet it'll be the usually skinny supermodel candidate.

Here's some vision of it with a person. If that armrest doesn't move, the designers and management that accepted it should be sacked.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7652724141606391061

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7652724141606391061