offshore171
Established Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,745
Huh?
Autocorrect may have mangled his post as it did mine. "To be fair, it MAY be just autocorrect"
Huh?
In that case it's never going to end. There will have to be compromises on both sides.It’s clear they are not going to end this until they get a cooperative regime with some trade offs.
I'm not referring to what offshore wrote. I am referring to what Tarric Brooker wrote in the post referred to by offshore.In this case, 'Economics' is correct, as it's the science of economics, not a plural of economy![]()
I know, I get it, but if only you realised how much restraint I show in not donning the cape on a daily/hourly basis.I was wondering when Apostrophe Man would say something
To be fair, it me be just autocorrect or text to speech on the phone...
View attachment 500669
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Sure, but I would argue that a journalist should proof read their work, even their tweets, which these days are at least a quasi-extension of their professional lives and output.Autocorrect may have mangled his post as it did mine. "To be fair, it MAY be just autocorrect"
Any more updates about the aviation fuel issue? Coz grammar is just grammar.
So how do you think this will play out in the next few weeks? Months….in terms of flight cancellations etc. And impact on world supplies for overseas airlines. Crystal ball?I don’t think diplomacy will have much to do with things. As I mentioned upthread China is not the biggest Aviation fuels provider and its likely cost was the factor in supply. Given one of our two refiners is the major aviation supplier to most airports in Australia and their biggest shareholder is the largest oil trader in the world, in will be in the interests of that shareholder to ensure supply continues!
