Middle East Airspace Diversions/Cancellations

And the full story about the “backchannel” deal between the UAE and Iran is that, allegedly, the UAE has promised to suspend offensive operations against Iran for 48 hours in return for Iran not attacking its civil aviation infrastructure or these repatriation flights.

Sounds believable to me, but indicates this is a small window to get people out before it will close down again.
Simply unsupported gossip. We have seen countless unsupported untrue news stories go to air the past 2 yrs. Only recently Al Jazerra has admitted paying foreign news outlets to run fabricated news. Why would any nation make a deal where the other party is not in complete command of it's troops.?
 
I'm not aware that the UAE, or any arab state, is undertaking any offensive operations against Iran. So I don't know what Iran wants or could get from UAE

This includes allowing offensive operations from its bases and territories.

But it has been reported 3 nations have agreed to join in an offensive role. This is incredibly sensitive and likely not made public.

When I was in Kandahar I saw a UAE C17 that was completely unmarked, not a single thing tying it to the UAE. They’re very careful in supporting the west whilst keeping their own population onside.

Simply unsupported gossip. We have seen countless unsupported untrue news stories go to air the past 2 yrs. Only recently Al Jazerra has admitted paying foreign news outlets to run fabricated news. Why would any nation make a deal where the other party is not in complete command of it's troops.?

I don’t disagree, that’s why I was clear to say allegedly. It is somewhat believable though, to Dubai, EK is one of its most valuable assets.
 
48 per hour is the standard rate - approx 1200 a day.

Its 80 daily flights using the special corridors.
That’s right. But Drron reported there was a cap on the total number of pax allowed, which was offered as an explanation for why there were only 200 pax on the EK a380.

Just trying to source the limit on lax numbers, rather than flights.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

That’s right. But Drron reported there was a cap on the total number of pax allowed, which was offered as an explanation for why there were only 200 pax on the EK a380.

Just trying to source the limit on lax numbers, rather than flights.

I would assume there isn't a limit, but it's quite common in repatriation flights for aircraft to go out below capacity, due to the complexities in getting the right people in the right place that are authorised to travel - people not turning up for the flight for whatever reason; Dubai is not quite at the stage of Kabul where you have masses of people storming taxiing aircraft; pax for the most part are comfortably accommodated in hotels waiting for the go-ahead to go to the airport.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top