Middle East Airspace Diversions/Cancellations

Screens at NRT last night listed QR as cancelled and an EK A380 parked outside. Saw 2 EK A380s parked at MEL (but that's normal for that time of day anyway) and a QR 777 parked at CBR.
 
Yea- lots of action in and out of DXB now which is pleasing to see. Oddly though, far less out of Abu Dhabi and Doha is still completely dead.

Can the risk really be THAT different between those super close locations? Or is it rather different risk appetite that EK is willing to show here?
 
They are safe in Dubai with DIL’s parents and report decreased missile activity yesterday.

Forgive the attempt at levity @Seat0B , but when I read that I thought "Yes, a parent will always like to hear that there is 'decreased missile activity' where the kids are."
 
There’s a lot of people in this part of the world… but we’re not all leaving! The backlog is largely travellers stuck midway. Still a lot, no doubt, but there aren’t tens of thousands of Australians trying to leave the gulf.

Interesting that EK/EY seem to be pushing ahead very hard with additional services. They are geographically in better positions than DOH/BAH, but there’s been a lot of activity in the UAE today.
Yes Seat Son is a long term resident of the UAE -5 years in Dubai and now 3 years in Abu Dhabi. He only wants to leave to go to his wedding in South Africa and will then be straight back “home” to the UAE.
 
Any ideas on how EK would have decided who to put on EK414? Pax bound for Australia by status?
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Friends flying QF9 on Saturday and have been advised they will be stopping in Singapore to refuel. Will they need to disembark and go through security to reboard

I presume they can leave everything on the plane if they need to disembark
 
Friends flying QF9 on Saturday and have been advised they will be stopping in Singapore to refuel. Will they need to disembark and go through security to reboard

I presume they can leave everything on the plane if they need to disembark
If they need to disembark, you need to take everything from the plane and clear security again I presume.
 
I must say- Emirates is pretty busy flying today. I wonder what has changed so massively from a day or two ago in terms of security of those flights. And why is Qatar seeing the situation so differently?
 
I must say- Emirates is pretty busy flying today. I wonder what has changed so massively from a day or two ago in terms of security of those flights. And why is Qatar seeing the situation so differently?
Who knows what their appetite for risk is.
Earlier today the US consulate in Dubai got hit be a drone and the consulate is only a couple of kilometres down the road from DXB and yet they are still flying in and out of there
 
I think you have to disembark when the plane is refuelling. We had to in KL flying home on Turkish airlines.
The difference here is that Turkish also sells seats on the IST-KUL sector separate to IST-SYD, which means everyone gets off in KUL even if you're continuing on to SYD, and even though they don't have fifth freedom rights. This situation is purely a fuel stop, which may mean pax can remain on board.

Would be curious to see how they manage this as I've seen it done differently in different parts of the world, and have wondered if it has anything to do with regulations at the refuelling point.
 
In 2024, passengers were required to disembark:

"All passengers on QF209 are required to leave the plane and then re-clear security screening at Singapore’s Changi Airport, where there is also a crew change. However, Qantas is not selling tickets for the standalone Perth-Singapore and Singapore-London sectors. (Both of those routes are already served by other Qantas flights – QF71 and QF1 respectively.)"

See also this historic article: Qantas Diverting Perth-London Flights via Singapore
 
The difference here is that Turkish also sells seats on the IST-KUL sector separate to IST-SYD, which means everyone gets off in KUL even if you're continuing on to SYD, and even though they don't have fifth freedom rights. This situation is purely a fuel stop, which may mean pax can remain on board.

Would be curious to see how they manage this as I've seen it done differently in different parts of the world, and have wondered if it has anything to do with regulations at the refuelling point.
Given that sometimes on planes you are told not to buckle seat belts on taking your seats as the plane is refueling then it shouldn't be an issue.
 
but my question is will they need to disembark

@Daver6 did you wife go via SIN and what was her experience

I think it is a requirement at SIN to do so. With a 75min layover plenty of time for it. Heck if at the right gate and towards the front if the plane and a fast walker, you could probably manage 20-30 mins in the lounge, if they'd let you in 🤣
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top