- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 16,975
Agree, however, blind /automatc tick boxes and form filling only take you so far.It’s humans, mistakes happen
Agree, however, blind /automatc tick boxes and form filling only take you so far.It’s humans, mistakes happen
That comment from the MAS captain certainly stood out too as a bit of a clanger decision - and I'm sure that it wouldn't have been just the FO that was startled if they ripped the nose gear off on a parked Hilux... makes you wonder just how much thinking was really going on in the coughpit! First time I've ever heard a captain being sensitive to an FO's feelings!Even more noteworthy, but neither crew selected TO/GA when they realised things looked wrong. In the case of MAS, the captain didn’t because “he didn’t want to startle the FO”. I suspect he would have been even more startled if they’d run into something.
Hey those road lollipop people earn a pretty penny - maybe not captain level but I would not be surprised around FO pay gradeMaybe have someone on a captain's salary holding up a stop/go sign
Maybe when the captain finds out at the runway threshold from the lollipop person that the FO didn't read the NOTAMS or ATIS properly he can smack the FO around the head with the lollipop sign!Hey those road lollipop people earn a pretty penny - maybe not captain level but I would not be surprised around FO pay grade
That’s the entire point…the captain should have read both items himself. All of the pilots should individually gather all of the data necessary for the take off calculations, then they should be done completely separately, and only coming together when you have a final answer. That’s intended to avoid missing things on the ATIS, making assumptions, and data entry errors. Actually, exactly the sort of thing that has happened here.Maybe when the captain finds out at the runway threshold from the lollipop person that the FO didn't read the NOTAMS or ATIS properly he can smack the FO around the head with the lollipop sign!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Thanks JB for the answer. I hadn't considered the level of the runway may well hide such things - low coughpits too.I agree that NOTAM information can be missed....but, there's no excuse for not having a good read of the paperwork for your departure airport, even if you leave everything else until later. My take on this is that reading of NOTAMS wasn't something they did at all.
ATIS isn't that long, and it was normal to write the entire thing down. Also for all pilots to get it separately, as any error would transfer to the take off data. To me this is obviously a case of only one person getting it. Most of the time, in modern aircraft you get it off the ACARs, so the entire thing is on a print out for you to read.
Lights aren't necessarily all that obvious, given that the end of the runway is the better part of 2 miles away. Also runways aren't level, and things can be hidden by the bumps. This is accentuated by aircraft with low coughpits. You would expect the obstructions to eventually be noticed, and for TOGA to be selected.
It's an inadequate system, but they should also have done much better.
And yet, in the same period of time, lots of other aircraft used the runway without issue. I suspect that the systemic failure lies within both airlines.
