Australia's ban on foreign carriers to stay

Status
Not open for further replies.

pauly7

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Posts
5,402
Virgin and Qantas will be celebrating tonight!


SINGAPORE Airlines will remain shut out of the trans-Pacific route when the federal Government launches its long-awaited aviation green paper tomorrow.
The draft blueprint for the nation's aviation industry reiterates the Government's stand that it has no immediate plans to grant additional third country access to the route, so that Virgin Blue offshoot V Australia can establish its operations.

Full article: Australia's ban on foreign carriers to stay | The Australian
 
The Qantas lobby wins again under the guise of protecting Virgin. Silly decision. Australian business (not including QF and Virgin) and consumers punished as a result.
 
I agree 100%, all this means to me is that I STILL won't give Qantas any money, and will fly via Singapore, Bangkok (ha ha!), or go with the newly improved UA.

Free market my cough!
 
The Qantas lobby wins again under the guise of protecting Virgin. Silly decision. Australian business (not including QF and Virgin) and consumers punished as a result.

Bigger picture thinking may bear out it is a wise decision for the interim with the economic climate as it is...

Virgin lobbied their lungs out as well, not just QF.
 
Bigger picture thinking may bear out it is a wise decision for the interim with the economic climate as it is...
.

So when some countries are lobbying in this climate to maintain free trade it is good that Australia, a fly speck of a country, reinforces protectionism?

The only jobs they are protecting in the short term are QF and V Australia - the jobs that they are risking are ancillary services and the broader business community who are forced to pay higher airfares.

I am guessing the bigger picture is just as far as Australia's borders then...:rolleyes:
 
SINGAPORE Airlines will remain shut out of the trans-Pacific route when the federal Government launches its long-awaited aviation green paper tomorrow.

The draft blueprint for the nation's aviation industry reiterates the Government's stand that it has no immediate plans to grant additional third country access to the route, so that Virgin Blue offshoot V Australia can establish its operations.

The report does continue on from this though, and this is what it says

One of the few competitive rights Australia does have is access to the trans-Pacific route between Australia and the United States. The Australian Government has made it clear that it has no immediate plans for additional third country access to the route at this time to allow V Australia a reasonable opportunity to establish its operations. The Government has not ruled out trading such access in the future, where this is considered to be in the national interest. The maximum national benefit possible would be sought if a decision is made to trade such access in the future


See page 106 of http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/aviation/nap/files/03_International_Aviation.pdf
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

So when some countries are lobbying in this climate to maintain free trade it is good that Australia, a fly speck of a country, reinforces protectionism?

The only jobs they are protecting in the short term are QF and V Australia - the jobs that they are risking are ancillary services and the broader business community who are forced to pay higher airfares.

I am guessing the bigger picture is just as far as Australia's borders then...:rolleyes:

The problem is that they are not really protecting aussie jobs either. QF makes no secret of its desire to outsource elements of its maintenance (and has done so) and has outsourced other QF functions. I would suggest the same would apply to VA. This is a joke of a decision.

Sure VA may have lobbied but QF is far more powerful in Canberra then VA. Having the former Chief of Staff to the current Prime Minister as your Head of Lobbying must help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top