So who made the 'mental health assessment'? I doubt there was a specialist on hand to meet the aircraft, and certainly could not have made a 'clinical' examination that would have held up in court.
Whether or not it was 'obvious' to say, the police who met the plane, I don't think its their job to make a call like that. If there were prima facie grounds for arrest, or at the very least, detention, then that should have been done, and then a proper assessment made. (and I know who I'm quoting here, juddles
)
Just for my info, anyone, what other apparent 'crimes' (besides assault, failing to obey the directions of cabin crew etc) are excused on the spot because of a quick 'mental health assessment?
It was in Australian airspace. Australian laws apply, AFAIK.
No, the only way i see this outcome happening if Scoot decided not to press charges, which is gutless. If the guy had 'mental health problems' then sure, let a competent person make a clinical assessment and let the court decide.
Remember, now, this guy could be sitting next to any of us on our next flight.