Delta pilots land airplane despite severe damage from hailstones

Status
Not open for further replies.
Incident: Delta A320 near Denver on Aug 7th 2015, hail strike

From reading the comments on the AV Herald, sounds like the pilots should have avoided the area, but didn't.

2B3604B200000578-3190510-image-a-48_1439059363606.jpg
 
They should just construct the nosecone out of the same material as the engine cowlings, or the turbine blades.
Problemo solved! Well, except for the windshield...
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

They should just construct the nosecone out of the same material as the engine cowlings, or the turbine blades.
Problemo solved! Well, except for the windshield...

The nosecone is a radome protecting the aircraft's weather and forward-looking radar.
As such it needs to be transparent to radar and/or radio waves and not attenuate the signal significantly.
So it can't be made of the same material as the engine cowlings or turbine blades.
 
Just for interest, the nose cone is made of AFRP - aramid fibre reinforced plastic.
This helps explain the very localised damage.
A320.jpg
 
A $200 depth sounder these days can pick up a sardine hiding in seaweed 100m under a tinnie, but a modern plane cannot detect a cascade of "baseball sized" hailstones??
 
The nosecone is a radome protecting the aircraft's weather and forward-looking radar.
As such it needs to be transparent to radar and/or radio waves and not attenuate the signal significantly.
So it can't be made of the same material as the engine cowlings or turbine blades.

Oh, I'm sorry, forgot to add the "WARNING WARNING THIS POST MAY CONTAIN SARCASM" warning.

Yes. Putting a Faraday cage in front of the radome will stop it (the radar) working.

On another note...

It seems that every time there is an aircraft disaster, the focus is on finding the "black boxes" intact (or orange cylinders).
But the big question is - why do they not just construct the entire plane out of the same material as the black boxes so the whole plane remains intact???? :):):):)

Damn, forgot the warning again.
 
I thought it was hyperbole, not sarcasm.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
From reading the comments on the AV Herald, sounds like the pilots should have avoided the area, but didn't.

AvHerald is as full of armchair experts as any other internet forum. We have no idea what his radar was showing. The satellite thermal images that are often trotted out have little relationship to the radar returns.
 
AvHerald is as full of armchair experts as any other internet forum. We have no idea what his radar was showing. The satellite thermal images that are often trotted out have little relationship to the radar returns.

Good to know! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top