You Should Never Complain About Qantas Again

Status
Not open for further replies.
And I'm sure QF has flown minus winglets after a similar incident at JFK.

They are not needed to keep the plane airborn, just improve fuel efficiency
 
That is a confusing story. It talks about the damage to a Sri Lankan airways aircraft and shos a pic of the BA aircraft with the damage
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

simongr said:
That is a confusing story. It talks about the damage to a Sri Lankan airways aircraft and shos a pic of the BA aircraft with the damage

The damage was caused by a collision between Sri Lankan and British Arways. Probably the only picture of the incident they had.
 
I get that - the Sri Lankan ran into teh BA a/c and ripped the wing tip off the BA a/c but all thr talk is of the Sri Lankan a/c flying on with a broken wing tip. Also confusing is that they saw the damage from the "club" which to me indicates BA again...
 
If they'd stuck it back on with duct tape (like they do bits that come loose on V8 supercars) nobody would've noticed ;-)
 
straitman said:
... until it ripped off on takeoff. :lol:

I've seen plenty of what looks like duct tape on Qantas wings (not too mention various bits missing)
 
oz_mark said:
I've seen plenty of what looks like duct tape on Qantas wings (not too mention various bits missing)
That's why it's referred to 100 mile/hour tape in the industry
 
straitman said:
That's why it's referred to 100 mile/hour tape in the industry
Its just a shame that Vr is somewhat greater than 100mph for most aircraft (with the notable exception of the Caribou which is the only aircraft to suffer bird strikes in the rear of the aircraft).
 
Totally confusing story. I had to read it 4 times to get it straight in my head OR maybe I'm just slow....

As for the tape, well at least the passengers would already be trapped onboard when the wing tip seperated at 100MPH :lol:
 
Flying Fox said:
Totally confusing story. I had to read it 4 times to get it straight in my head OR maybe I'm just slow....

As for the tape, well at least the passengers would already be trapped onboard when the wing tip seperated at 100MPH :lol:
I'm with both you FF and Simongr. The pictures in the story clearly show a winglet (red), and BA's wing in a state of "duck-tape fixable" disarray.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top