AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
simongr said:That is a confusing story. It talks about the damage to a Sri Lankan airways aircraft and shos a pic of the BA aircraft with the damage
... until it ripped off on takeoff.ColinP said:If they'd stuck it back on with duct tape (like they do bits that come loose on V8 supercars) nobody would've noticed ;-)
straitman said:... until it ripped off on takeoff.![]()
That's why it's referred to 100 mile/hour tape in the industryoz_mark said:I've seen plenty of what looks like duct tape on Qantas wings (not too mention various bits missing)
Its just a shame that Vr is somewhat greater than 100mph for most aircraft (with the notable exception of the Caribou which is the only aircraft to suffer bird strikes in the rear of the aircraft).straitman said:That's why it's referred to 100 mile/hour tape in the industry
straitman said:That's why it's referred to 100 mile/hour tape in the industry
I'm with both you FF and Simongr. The pictures in the story clearly show a winglet (red), and BA's wing in a state of "duck-tape fixable" disarray.Flying Fox said:Totally confusing story. I had to read it 4 times to get it straight in my head OR maybe I'm just slow....
As for the tape, well at least the passengers would already be trapped onboard when the wing tip seperated at 100MPH![]()