austrider said:
This basically backs up the points lovetravellingoz and drron were making. i.e for pure points redemption and ignoring other factors, if main source of points is from flying, then AA is cheaper to redeem, but if points are from CC, then QF
Actually it doesn't necessarily for premium class travel, it does depend on where you are going. for a trip to PEK, then yes, I agree that QF seems a better choice for using miles
If however, going to London, for example
this would be 120k/160k using AA miles vs 256k/384k using QF miles assuming able to use a QF award or 278k/406k if using airlines such as JL/CX
120k AA miles requires 100000 Starwood points which in turn requires 333,334 AMEX points
160k AA miles requires 130000 Starwood points which in turn requires 393,394 AMEX points
As can be seen, an AA award SYD-LHR in 1st on CX is cheaper using AA points than QF points and against the QF award is only 9940 miles more expensive
Using the AA miles may be 9940 more expensive but there is a saving of $442 in surcharges which (imo) more than offsets the extra
If solely earning miles through credit cards, I would definitely consider each planned booking on its own merits
If doing reasonable amounts of travel, even in discount economy on QF, I posit that in many cases the AA will work out better for premium travel when needing to top up
For example; assuming 50% earning on Qf; if having flown 120,000 miles over time, this would give 120k QF points vs 60k AA points ( assuming no status has been earned )
If then wanting to travel to europe in business class, then this would require 60k additional points to an AA account ( 151k approx AMEX points ) vs 136k/158k AMEX points top off to QF. Again there will be the $442 saving on fuel fines.
Dave