US positions for potential AA takeover, gaining support from AA unions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

So now that US gave made their intentions clear, over to AA. Articles states US has more to gain by a merger. So what's really in it for AA?
Is bigger necessarily better?
 
Last edited:
So what's really in it for AA?
For AA management, nothing but the sack probably... therefore any future takeover by US is likely to be hostile (i.e. not supported by AA management).

For a hostile takeover of a company under ch11 protection to take place, the creditors would have to support it.

The bankruptcy court has appointed a board to represent the interests of the unsecured creditors.

Union members have seats on this board.

US will need to gain the acceptance of the majority votes on this board to be able to file its takeover plans for consideration by the court, by this route.

Thus - the unsecured creditors need to see more light at the end of the tunnel from a US take over, rather than the current AA management rescue plan. (So, this announcement by US and the Pilot, FA & Mechanics' unions is important, because it is their way of saying "yes" to that proposition.)

Us bigger necessarily better?
For US management, presumably they do see bigger as better.

For AA unions, it could double as a negotiating tactic to pressure for improved membership outcomes from the AA management plan.
 
Last edited:
I'll add some speculation on US management intentions.

In that they have the "support" of the existing AA union membership, in a merged entity (because of the difference in size) any election for union representation would likely go in the direction of AA's unions. This would solve the 7 year old problem US has with their flight attendants (and the union representing US members) who have failed to ratify contract following the previous merger with US.

I wonder what flying the 50K miles (credited to AA) I need for LTG will get me in the medium term.

Not wandering, just looking in from the sidelines.

Fred
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Currently Active Users

Back
Top