AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
It is my understanding this is the case, government have negotiated very cheap rates and I would find it difficult to believe Qantas has not taken no points earn into account in calculating those rates. We all know those seats do have some value/cost.Although I don't know if govt fares were slightly reduced anyway because no points?
It is my understanding this is the case, government have negotiated very cheap rates and I would find it difficult to believe Qantas has not taken no points earn into account in calculating those rates. We all know those seats do have some value/cost.
Is this due to ABBOTT or TURNBULL?![]()
Interesting issue.
I just looked now (10pm Wednesday) for flights tomorrow (Thursday) between MEL-SYD. Most of the early morning flights had award seats available, taxes/fees of $30. The cheapest red e-deals are in the $200-$251 range. So a saving of $170-$221.
Let's assume an average of $200 saving... if just 5 Victorian public servants a day were heading off interstate on 220 work days a year - that's an annual $220k saving. Coming home however most of the evening flights had no awards.
More of a saving if you had secretaries/ministers flying - business class awards are freely available, saving $750, and those seats are available both ways, even at peak times.
Although I don't know if govt fares were slightly reduced anyway because no points?
probably not going to be a good thing for the average punter if govt departments can snaffle all the award seats![]()
Neither.
There is an existing thread on this very topic, just a couple of months old: http://www.australianfrequentflyer....edgov-wants-collect-frequent-flyer-69097.html
I'm not sure I follow your comments. However, one must also factor in how many paid flights need to be achieved for just one award flight.
One complication of this ridiculous suggestion (of the Finance Department's) is that employees are entitled to status credits. If an employee then finds him or herself on an award flight, one of that employee's conditions of employment has actually been breached.