QF2 diversion to Baku

If they had been in a military aircraft they would have carried on until they had completed their flight.
But they’re not military and shouldn’t be expected to operate as such - well, unless the cough has hit the fan.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

'Can't exceed crew hours'. 'Diddums'. If they had been in a military aircraft they would have carried on until they had completed their flight. Time they were told to get a reality check in circumstances like this....
I don’t think it needs to be binary, e.g. in the event of emergency where certain parameters are met, crew hours can be exceed by [10%].

The aviation industry have the a bunch of exemptions for curfews and landing rights too for emergencies
 
Not so much the incovenience factor - I reckon there's an argument there's a potential safety issue leaving 400 Aussies stranded in a foreign country they didn't expect to be dropped into, and where the airline has no direct oversight as to their welfare.
Having just been there I can assure you Azerbaijan is extremely safe!
 
Having just been there I can assure you Azerbaijan is extremely safe!
I'm sure it is, but things go wrong even in the safest of countries. My point is around the potential for mishap when you throw a bunch of tired and frustrated people into a strange environment where you (as the airline) have little control and no presence on the ground.

Even in the Virgin example where passengers had to ultimately sleep in the airport, they were reportedly in the process of preparing the aircraft to fly when the issue of crew hours put a stop to it. I just wonder how much consideration is given towards the safety and well-being of the offloaded passengers in these situations.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure it is, but things go wrong even in the safest of countries. My point is around the potential for mishap when you throw a bunch of tired and frustrated people into a strange environment where you (as the airline) have little control and no presence on the ground.

Even in the Virgin example where passengers had to ultimately sleep in the airport, they were reportedly in the process of preparing the aircraft to fly when the issue of crew hours put a stop to it. I just wonder how much consideration is given towards the safety and well-being of the offloaded passengers in these situations.
And if there is an accident because the crew is fatigued? It’s a lot safer to be sleeping in an airport than jumping down the slide from the top deck of an A380 in an evacuation. There is a reason why there are duty limits for crew.
 
Stupid question but it’s a 13.5hr flight between LHR and SIN, so I would assume there should be 2 sets of crews including pilots to make the flight legal for fatigue management? If so then where is the second crew?
 
Stupid question but it’s a 13.5hr flight between LHR and SIN, so I would assume there should be 2 sets of crews including pilots to make the flight legal for fatigue management? If so then where is the second crew?
All the crew have the same sign in time, so the clock ticks the same presumedly. I believe QF crews normally consist of 1 captain, 2 First Officers and 1 Second Officer, so not quite 2 sets of crew in any event.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top