Dave Noble
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 6,419
It is hardly relevant to compare the police and qantas. The problem is this can be considered to be theft. There was a case of some people who found a sum of cash in a house shortly after they purchased it. They were charged with theft because they just kept the money.
Absolutely. No different to someone finding $50 on the pavement, picking it up and keeping it
medhead said:Obviously it is different for companies that can set up a lost property process to deal with the issue of reporting found items to police. But based on some of the quotes from the story one would have to question if qantas is following such process or even the effectiveness of the process in fairly considering the rightful owners.
Indeed. QF do have a lost property process and I doubt, regardess of inferrences , that they just collect and sell the items but rather keep them for the required period for those who report it. No real difference to the concept of handing item into police and after appropriate time is lapsed being entitled to the item if the owner has not claimed it