SeatBackForward
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Posts
- 5,741
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Oneworld
- Emerald
The same as boarding for QF flights out of USA ports?
The model seems to be SITA Smart Path.
SITA Smart Path uses the world’s best-performing facial recognition technology.* That means our matching technology is fast and accurate. Enhanced security is a key benefit. (Put simply, Smart Path is better at facial recognition than people are.) But the real beauty of Smart Path is improved airport efficiency and enhanced customer experience. In live implementations in busy airports, Smart Path cuts boarding times by around 30%.
Not that they're trialling biometrics or a requirement,
Maybe they opt in to facial biometric (whenever it is offered). This could be done at check in and after that no BP required. But that would completely degrade the online check in that so many people do.So how does it work domestically to link your face to BP I wonder?
I vaguely remember reading WSI shoud have all the tech ready from day 1 in anticipation for future changes - but no timeline.Have we info yet on whether biometrics are or are not being collected? Clearly QF thinks that they will be at some point.
Probably opt in for domestic and likely auto captured for international - given we're scanning our face to pass immigration anyways. I think some of Japanese metro trains are trialling facial recognition. You opt in and just walk through instead of tapping to be even more efficient than their blazing fast nfc tap.Before we hold out European or Canadian usage as a way of saying 'no worries, its here already', I'd also like a comparison of laws in those countries and here relating to biometric data security, storage and use. I have a feeling Australian laws are pretty cough at least compared to the Europeans.
And my question up-thread. When the airlines here do go biometric, where do they acquire the data that says this face is this person?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
