Absolutely. I’d expect QF31/32 for the SYD-SIN-LHR flights.I wonder if they’ll renumber QF1/2 (via SIN) a season before they launch the sunrise flights? I bit like how HNL got renumbered to 103/104 before they launched the new JFK (via AKL) flights.
Waiting for 3 aircraft before starting Sunrise flights suggests they intend to launch the routes with daily flights.However I think until SYD sunrise is daily, the via SIN service will stay numbered from SYD.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
As much as I would love SIN-LHR to remain an A380 flight to increase chances of J/F seat releases, I do think it would likely change to a 787 flight from BNE or possibly an A350 without the extra fuel tank.But MEL will get their own sunrise flights in time, so long term would make sense for the flight number to go from BNE (so they can say they have direct flights to all big 4 cities), but I’d expect the actual (larger) aircraft to go from SYD and switch to the LHR flight in SIN. They used to do this on the LAX-JFK segment, flight number came from SYD but aircraft came from BNE.
The majority flying SYD-LHR will still stop in SIN, KUL, DXB, DOH, AUH, HKG, etc....think many would prefer a stop in SIN
They should absolutely do this. I'm honestly surprised that airlines haven't moved to a more premium model for long haul flights. The market for bare minimum pricing even if this means a shoebox for 10+hrs seems to be there!I actually wonder whether they might market the whole back of plane as Economy Plus given the minimum 33" pitch.
SQ?I'm honestly surprised that airlines haven't moved to a more premium model for long haul flights.
