turtlemichael
Established Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Posts
- 1,928
Interesting New York Times read on the A380. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/b...column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Have Qantas ever considered putting in a bar in their A380 like emirates. it's definitely a selling point
Original link works for me.You are allowed to read a few free articles per month.
Certainly it suggests that QF made a mistake with the A380.
Would be great to see 787's in QF livery to SIN,BKK,China etc.
I have posted previously (several times) some stats from a test pilot friend of mine that actually disagree with your idea of the A380 being efficient on the very long haul routes. On those routes you actually lose efficiency and start carrying extra fuel just so you can burn it.I'm going to disagree with you a bit, I think the A380 makes a lot of sense to QF. AU to the USA to example.
You are spot On with routes to Asia they certainly not suitable for it, even SQ are taking them away from AU.
I don't think it's the lumbering dinosaur that it's portrayed out to be in the article, but it certainly was overhyped as the "way of the future"
It is a little strange that no American airline has used a 380 or that it wasn't more widely taken up, especially since the 747s are very quickly disappearing from the skies and passenger numbers overall have been climbing in many parts of the world.
Parochialism is not strange, just well practiced in this case.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Would be great to see 787's in QF livery to SIN,BKK,China etc.
Have Qantas ever considered putting in a bar in their A380 like emirates. it's definitely a selling point
Having just enjoyed the EK bar again I think that QF should remove the upper economy and put in a bar this would then justify the higher prices that QF regularly charge and provide a true premium carrier experience IMHO.![]()