Doubt it will ever be possible.
Different check-in systems, and i imagine it would be to much of a hassle changing programs every time, continually signing in, changing stock and BP printers and then extra training costs.
You'd think that with all the Jetstar-isation going around that something like this would've been a good way to really establish the strength and connectivity of the supposed two airlines which form the workhorse of the Group.
But why do I live in such hope? That would be too sensible.
On a more pragmatic level, what measure of effort on the above required systems would you imagine makes the proposal infeasible? I've got two models of how something like this could work.
dk4 alluded to one of them: a dedicated machine for JQ check-in:
- This machine would only be used for JQ check-ins. This avoids having to change programs (I assume between QF system and JQ system is the problem at hand). As for logging in continuously, wouldn't QF have the same thing (you need to login to the system to use it), so at least the JQ system can have the same thing (someone would log the computer in, or just like the QF systems you would need to do it every time you want to use it).
- The machine would have dedicated BP stock if so desired.
- Extra training costs: inevitable, but then how did those people in the QPs get trained up to use the JQ system so they could do check-ins for JQ there? There is a business case for the QPs but no business case for other check-in areas?
Perhaps that is trivialising the whole thing a bit - happy to be told more about the
real costs of these kinds of changes or implementations - but I still think it's not as insurmountable as it is being postured.
The only thing I can see with this is whether it would make F check-in more crowded. Unfortunately, I wouldn't think many people have kept tabs on the numbers of WPs (let alone other elites) who fly on JQ (in any given class). But just take a stock on how many QF flights there are, then add in the JQ flights (international ones, of course). Now assuming a similar number of WPs on those flights as are estimated for QF metal flights of similar length and destination, would that make F check-in too busy, or would it simply mean that the staff will have to give up some of their gossiping/nail-filing time (last words said tongue in cheek)? I suppose - being serious - this is also one of the resistances from staff about this idea (no more workload, especially if infrastructure or additional human resources will not be provided).
The other model is relatively simple. Use the Star Class check-in or another dedicated check-in desk for eligible priority passengers (I guess ideally this should be limited to WP, CL and possibly interlining J, *C and F; SG perhaps; no to PS and QP). This time at least you don't need to train any additional QF staff on how to use the system, although it may require an additional JQ staff to be present at check-in (which, if it came to that, would probably not happen thanks to the bean counters). I presume part of the "extra training costs" resistance and thus barrier to implementation is that there are plenty of old-school QF staff (particularly those that work in F check-in / systems) who are opposed to taking on additional responsibilities, training and commitment which would include handling JQ bookings.
The second model is not as elegant as the first as WPs/CLs can't use the F check-in suites, but at least it offers a degree of priority which is significantly better than the present (which is none!). Of course, the second model puts the burden of change on JQ rather than QF. I can imagine that JQ with its relatively simpleton view will not look to be any more accommodating to QF elites than it has to (which at present is close to nothing, except for access rules to the two JQ network lounges).