HKG delays today after freighter runs off runway

markis10

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Posts
31,767
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
Oneworld
Sapphire

Sadly one confirmed dead as well as one missing.
 
Began life in 1993 as an ANA passenger aircraf, and was the first to carrier a Pokemon livery afaik. Converted to freighter in 2011 and had a few operators since.

While the aircraft carries an EK flight number, it's all in AirACT livery, much like QFs arrangement with Atlas Air for the 747-8 cargo aircraft.


RIP to the ground crew in the wrong place.
Air crew must be feeling very fortunate.
 

Sadly one confirmed dead as well as one missing.
Make it 2 dead - confirmed by airport authorities
 
I’m having a bit of trouble working out the dynamics of this one. The story seems to be that the vehicle was on the perimeter road, so it’s incidental to the event. The aircraft has touched down at the right spot, and maintained centreline for about 4,000’, before a quite abrupt divergence. It’s not reverse thrust; you barely notice if it’s asymmetric. Blown tyres are easily handled. The crosswind is minimal.
 
I’m having a bit of trouble working out the dynamics of this one. The story seems to be that the vehicle was on the perimeter road, so it’s incidental to the event. The aircraft has touched down at the right spot, and maintained centreline for about 4,000’, before a quite abrupt divergence. It’s not reverse thrust; you barely notice if it’s asymmetric. Blown tyres are easily handled. The crosswind is minimal.

Speculation in comments on AvHerald that the service vehicle may have been on the runway, and the behaviour of the B747 a consequence of when the 2 came in contact at ?100 knots; maybe the vehicle wedged in the nose wheel assembly, causing the veering. I know, commentators are usually crazy, but seems plausible to this punter, in the absence of more info
 
That would make sense, but what seem to be official reports say it was on the perimeter road. Basically, if it was on the runway, then it was the cause, but if not, what?
 
From the clip of this I saw on Youtube this morning, it appeared to be one thing, but looking at FR24 myself shows that it wasn't what I expected from the quick clip. 1760957942930.png1760957942940.png
 
That would make sense, but what seem to be official reports say it was on the perimeter road. Basically, if it was on the runway, then it was the cause, but if not, what?

Something else on the runway that they thought veering off would be a better idea than hitting it?
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Doesn't add much. No audio from EK aircraft post landing, just ATC dealing with other traffic.
Text states that ground vehicle was near the fence line.

Also BBC coverage of an airport press conference, confirming the ground vehicle was patrolling the fence line road.

 
Last edited:

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top