Re: From 'alert' to 'alarmed': terror threat level has been raised from medium to hig
Hope! Remember the botched ASIS hotel raids some years back?
Or the AFP dummy bomb misplaced with 340gms of C4 inside just no detonator?
I was involved with planning for Sydney Olympics in the Eastern Suburbs. This was more than a year out.
I identified a major security vulnerability that could have seen multiple planes destroyed, Sydney Airport out of action for months etc.
I detailed the scenario, vantage points, timing, execution. I also laid out the steps to prevent such an attack. Costed at less than a couple of hundred thousand annually for permanent fix.
Security supremo for the area agreed, all correct and somewhat "alarming" - his exact words. Would raise it at weekly 'security summit'.
Came back to me and said we're not going to do anything about it as it is not Olympics specific venue. So spend not from our budget. We've spoken with Sydney Airport and they are not inclined to do anything.
I was stunned. He'd acknowledged it was a viable threat, perhaps most visible (El Al plane perhaps) and would create on-going chaos with Sydney Airport out for extended period - and now "Sydney Airport not inclined."
I agitated for the next 14 months - nothing was ever done.
Curiously enough post 9/11 I noticed part of what I outlined as preventative measures has been done but not the most significant (and still hasn't). The door is closed but not locked.
9/11 busted the myth of US domestic security.
Locally, there was the myth of Aust Regulatory supervision of financial system protecting Super from fraud - $4bn later the reality is known.
Apathy is only realised as a problem AFTER the event.
I sincerely hope I am not proven wrong - but I really don't see the point in making a big deal about raising our alert status?
In the UK I could understand it - but here in Australia I seriously wonder what all the fuss is about, and I would hope we have a competent security service able to monitor our small and confined population (no open borders like in Europe or guns like the USA). Create panic in the population? Show how decisive our government is and deflect from the budget woes?
Hope! Remember the botched ASIS hotel raids some years back?
Or the AFP dummy bomb misplaced with 340gms of C4 inside just no detonator?
I was involved with planning for Sydney Olympics in the Eastern Suburbs. This was more than a year out.
I identified a major security vulnerability that could have seen multiple planes destroyed, Sydney Airport out of action for months etc.
I detailed the scenario, vantage points, timing, execution. I also laid out the steps to prevent such an attack. Costed at less than a couple of hundred thousand annually for permanent fix.
Security supremo for the area agreed, all correct and somewhat "alarming" - his exact words. Would raise it at weekly 'security summit'.
Came back to me and said we're not going to do anything about it as it is not Olympics specific venue. So spend not from our budget. We've spoken with Sydney Airport and they are not inclined to do anything.
I was stunned. He'd acknowledged it was a viable threat, perhaps most visible (El Al plane perhaps) and would create on-going chaos with Sydney Airport out for extended period - and now "Sydney Airport not inclined."
I agitated for the next 14 months - nothing was ever done.
Curiously enough post 9/11 I noticed part of what I outlined as preventative measures has been done but not the most significant (and still hasn't). The door is closed but not locked.
9/11 busted the myth of US domestic security.
Locally, there was the myth of Aust Regulatory supervision of financial system protecting Super from fraud - $4bn later the reality is known.
Apathy is only realised as a problem AFTER the event.