After lunch we moved to the northern leg of the fjord that had an extraordinary bedrock bar across most of it. How that managed not to be bulldozed away by the glacier, no-one could explain#
View attachment 454071
View attachment 454070
We crept through and the scenery was much the same as we have seen already, but the weather was decidedly uninviting and I decided not do that afternoon's zodiac.
View attachment 454072
View attachment 454073
Usual glacier
View attachment 454074
Another hut
View attachment 454075
And the expeds on point duty, as usual.
View attachment 454076
So now I can get something off my chest. Readers of my TRs will be used to me railing against lack of knowledge by the expeds of the geology around us, be it in the Kimberly, Antarctica etc. This is mainly sort of self-pi55-taking, but it is annoying where there is a great geological feature that would interest people and the expeds are clueless.
On this trip, the exped leader, French of course, was very good - he did the evening recaps and was always on the ground for a chat on land trips, with his rifle. He in his briefings, and the cruise literature both highlighted the geology of Svalbard as a feature of the cruise; amazing, etc etc. Said there would actually be a geology briefing!! I looked forward to it!
So what happened?
Rien. Zilch. Bugger-all. Not a whisper for three days. There was a geologist on board and later I found out that she was very good - the best I've come across on a cruise. Being French, she was always on the French zodiacs and was
never sighted on board except suited-up on her way to the French zodiacs. So I left a message for her asking when the geology briefing would be. She called me in my cabin. TL, DR - she was far too busy to give a geology briefing to the English-speakers. She had given
two to the French group and didn't have any more time. WTF? After a bit of prodding by me, she said she could probably be able to do one at the end of the cruise - how would that be? Not very good, I said. Sort of giving a curatorial talk on a gallery exhibition as you left the building. She didn't like that!!! Anyway we parted and I knew I had made an enemy.
Quelle domage.
So, imagine my surprise that we got a geology briefing the following evening

. A bit short, but very good. Made what we had been seeing make sense. Others said so too. I happened to pass her the next day and she asked, a bit awkwardly, how the briefing was. Excellent! I think she was a bit surprised at my level of technical knowledge. But the damage had been done. Never spoke to her again.
# All the other exped crew were even more clueless about the geology than in my previous cruises. Later, I'll show a mountainside that was completly folded up - amazing sight, for anyone, I'd think. May as well be a blank wall for the interest of the expeds. I chatted to the Aussie exped once and lamented the lack of geology talks - noting that what we saw was 38% geology, 60% water and less than 2% flora and fauna and maybe there was an imbalance? He didn't mind me saying that - saw what I was getting at (in a friendly way).
Don't get me started again about the bloody birders!!
