CX to stop flying to Kuala Lumpur

Status
Not open for further replies.

trippin_the_rift

Established Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
4,035
Hot off the rumour mill:

CX to stop flying HKG/KUL/HKG from March 2017 and KA (Dragon Air) will take over.
This means CX will no longer fly to Malaysia after dropping Penang a while back
 
Hot off the rumour mill:

CX to stop flying HKG/KUL/HKG from March 2017 and KA (Dragon Air) will take over.
This means CX will no longer fly to Malaysia after dropping Penang a while back

Ooh...I have a Cx Hkg-Kul in Feb 17...is KA part of OW ? (thinking of Pier F access)
 
It almost begs to reason - what is the difference between CX and KA? If the difference is nearly indistinguishable, then what's the big deal in maintaining the brands? Or is there some detail that I've missed?
 
It almost begs to reason - what is the difference between CX and KA? If the difference is nearly indistinguishable, then what's the big deal in maintaining the brands? Or is there some detail that I've missed?
Probably more to do with costs such as employees pay rates/conditions and other things.

A bit like Jitcinnict and Qantas.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Perhaps slowly KA will become the leisure brand, and CX the business brand, similar to JQ/QF respectively.
 
It almost begs to reason - what is the difference between CX and KA? If the difference is nearly indistinguishable, then what's the big deal in maintaining the brands? Or is there some detail that I've missed?

Not sure what's exactly happened with the rebranding but KA used to hold (still does?) a separate operating certificate with separate air traffic rights. The two airlines therefore have greater penetration into markets.
 
It almost begs to reason - what is the difference between CX and KA? If the difference is nearly indistinguishable, then what's the big deal in maintaining the brands? Or is there some detail that I've missed?

I've heard that CX has an industrial dispute with its pilots which is preventing training of new pilots. By shifting routes to KA they can redeploy the CX pilots onto new routes to facilitate expansion. It makes sense to switch KUL since it has limited full-service competition - MH is only running 737s on the route nowadays with a similar hard product to CX/KA.

Further to the above I believe KA has a much better brand recognition in the Chinese market, which goes back to the days when CX did not have rights to fly to China. Even today KA flies to 20+ destinations in China while CX only flies to PEK and PVG. I don't know how much of this brand recognition will be diluted by the rebranding to Cathay Dragon later this year though.
 
I've heard that CX has an industrial dispute with its pilots which is preventing training of new pilots. By shifting routes to KA they can redeploy the CX pilots onto new routes to facilitate expansion. It makes sense to switch KUL since it has limited full-service competition - MH is only running 737s on the route nowadays with a similar hard product to CX/KA.

Further to the above I believe KA has a much better brand recognition in the Chinese market, which goes back to the days when CX did not have rights to fly to China. Even today KA flies to 20+ destinations in China while CX only flies to PEK and PVG. I don't know how much of this brand recognition will be diluted by the rebranding to Cathay Dragon later this year though.

Yep, this is the latest in a saga of many years to bust the main CX pilots union - CX is transferring aircraft to KA along with inexperienced 2nd officers on local contracts to gain experience.

2nd officer positions were created a few years back to hire local pilots on very low salaries to put downward pressure on pilot salaries, it remains to be seen if this will succeed given that most have no flying experience and there continues to be a global shortage of pilots.

It's likely that industrial action (which has been ongoing for many months now) will continue into the future while CX management continues to undermine pay & conditions for existing pilots. CX tried this previously in it's cargo operation and it failed when the pilots union refused to provide training or checking to the new cargo crews, the entire operation was absorbed back into CX's main cargo business on the same conditions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top